Correct me if I’m wrong but I did a test flight this month and it seemed to me that the maximum speed achievable at high altitude was the same with or without the cans, which doesn’t make much sense.
Gaijin does not properly model drag on pylon mounted ordnance.
Ah
Looks like a small issue
You’re a bit late, we were already informed a few minutes ago and frankly it’s not good news.
2 Likes
Is this from 2009 or a different WVR engagement?
Why is that
I have found this ( The Typhoon has a 30-degree instantaneous turn rate and a sustained turn rate of 23 degrees, while the Rafale has an instantaneous turn rate of 30 degrees and a sustained turn rate of 24 degrees.Both fighter jets have the ability to quickly regain energy with the help of faster climb rates. Rafale’s close-coupled canards enhance its maximum lift and drag ratio, while its 48-degree wing sweep gives it a better lift-to-drag ratio as compared to Eurofighter’s 52-degree sweep.However, the Typhoon’s higher sweep also causes less drag during cruise flights. The Rafale’s close-coupled canard accords it with better spin recovery capability.
The Rafale has better supersonic maneuverability and post-stall maneuverability. In terms of the Angle of Attack (AoA), Rafale can achieve a 100 to 110 degrees AoA angle of attack, while the Typhoon is limited to 70 degrees.
But the Typhoon’s Leading Edge Root Extensions (LERX) and ridges along the fuselage give it a 100-degree AoA angle of attack.n LERX, the roots of the delta wings meet the main body of the aircraft, right above its chin intake. The LERX was introduced in the Typhoon as a part of the Aerodynamic Modification Kit (KIT).) So do you think we are equivalent in the game ?
1 Like
1 This is not the actual armament of the plane
2 This allows them to muddy the waters and not correct the Mica’s flight model which is disastrous
Not so fast ahaha
Idk, here is Gripen also;
Because we hop gaijin will orrect FM of MICA (turn, kinetic energy, range …) more than putting 8 MICA on Rafale F3R wich is not accurate because French army never use that
I have 32 instanteanous on a document
I would like to see such a correct flight path marker in the game…🫣
for both of them or just the rafale ?
The Rafale has one of the best HUDs in the world (currently the Tiger’s in-game)
1 Like
No mica ir for Raf with placeholder seeker ≠ iris-t for ef.
you are right. And that is why I do not understand why they cannot make a correct FPM in so much time. Without it it is impossible to fly comfortably near the ground
It was an export configuration for India and for France they simply don’t use but it’s available
F3R is the last version before the F4 and it incorporated the 8 pylons for the F4
It will be a Frankenstein rafale just like the 2000 5f with the PGM that it has and the 2 magic on the pylons