Dassault Rafale - Variants, Characteristics, Armament and Performance

With Magic 2 we’ll probably get a 2 MICA + 2 M2 config default.

1 Like

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cbI3L2RYseBC

Supercruise bug report

1 Like

Nice! In the screenshot, we can see some information about the takeoff rating, which could be added to the engine power consideration.

@WreckingAres283 @Smin1080p_WT
The flight path marker is working incorrectly on new rafale and all aircraft with HUDs. I submitted a report regarding the F-16 (noting that this affects all aircraft), but the community bug reporter I contacted on the Russian-language forum closed the report, explaining that he is a ground player, doesn’t understand this issue, and suggested I contact you instead.
Overall, this bug interferes with flying in cockpit view close to the ground.
At the same time, I couldn’t find documents that specifically describe the operation of this marker, as it’s one of the obvious mechanics (besides, it works correctly in first-person view). All flight crew operation manuals mention only the name of this marker without detailed explanations. In general, searching for documentation on it (as requested on the .ru forum) is like searching for documents that explain why instrument needles should move to the right and not the left.
Could you please clarify whether it makes sense to submit a report about this in English, and if it’s possible to fix this bug?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8JVg38FJzsd0
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IaNNOfeViROs

1 Like

I’m worried about this because the more planes there are with this bug, the harder it will be to fix it later. This update will only increase the number of bugs if nothing is done.

If we truly gets a working AESA with accurate performance, HMD should be extremely reliable to lock close range, so hopefully this point should be void.

Personally I don’t think I’d even mount a Magic 2 on my Rafale unless it’s after a refueling in endgame because I’m anticipating a 1v1. I manage with 6 R77 / 5 R77 + 1 ET on the Mig29SMT just fine and they’re worse than the MICA in pretty much everything.

It would be a different story if we got a 9M or something equivalent, because they have a niche use case the Magic / R73 doesn’t cover.

Testing Rafale FM update shortly.

sure, if you want to do it, do it :) I dont know how to show that exatly.

guys we won : Community Bug Reporting System

8 mica coming

14 Likes

Yay, another reason for them not to unfuck MICA.

2 Likes

Extra Thiccc.


The new HUD is surprising on the Rafale

4 Likes

Just because it was accepted doesn’t mean it will be put into the game.

Soon

4 Likes

Really hope it isn’t. 6 would be fine if they fixed them. Now we’re just going to have to deal with them doing nothing because now we’ve plenty if they get added.

1 Like

I mean it’s still a great news because they can consider it.

They won’t be fixed

Like @Fluffy_Bucketles I would much prefer that they correct the flight model of the Mica rather than putting missiles that do not correspond to the realistic payload.

2 Likes

same

1 Like

Supercruise stuck at ~1.14-1.15 mach at 9km alt

6 Likes