The cross which showed location of the designated aera on the radar mfd is also not working anymore
1 Like
Rafale’s IRST FOV should be increased from 64° x 40° to 80° x 60°: Community Bug Reporting System
14 Likes
It looks like you may partially get your wish. Looks like it’s supposed to be 140x16 and not 140x31.
4 Likes
hi direct support when will see mica em range being fixed?
When the sky falls upon us and the majority of trees have missiles exceeding its range twofold.
1 Like
Balance is why my friend.
With a realistic MICA the Rafale beats everything.
Expect to see buffs when the 120C comes to game
2 Likes
MICA missile should have 360 degree launch envelope
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OUJ8LVK7vaXf
11 Likes
Where was AIM-54 or R27ER balance?
lol
With a realistic MICA, the French have some level of competitiveness in BVR. Without it, we’re relegated to point blank with a missile that was designed for short and medium range capacity.
But I’m sure “Just make something better lol” only counts until that better gets added.
6 Likes
i agree that mica with better range until 40km and turn then any missile tvc+ 50g should not be in game right now but at least make it lil better in range instead of fixing its missing 34% range why not give it 15% or 20 and leave the rest to when we get more competitive missile yes mica em with full performance can beat every missile time to target until 45km then othr missile start to out drag it or something like that
Behave…the Rafale is the best jet in the game.
The Aim54 and R-27 cannot pull 50G and are not TVC missiles coupled to the best Radar, best overall airframe
1 Like
Doesn’t respond to the balance question? How was the AIM54 balanced? With absolutely no counter and destroying entire lobbies?
Then lose the 2 additonal missiles
The Rafale with a BVR missile equal to an F-15E/Typhoon while also having great performance and the best Radar and the short to medium range ARHM.
1 Like
Wow, it’s almost like that’s what we’ve been saying, shock horror.
It was argued that MICA ought to be fixed instead of 2 extras, and instead they went with 2 extras.
4 Likes
I see Rafale and Mica bug report i press “i have the same issue” button.
1 Like
My brother, how about instead of nerfing Rafale we try to fix both EFT and Rafale at the same time?
Both planes still underperforms in many area (in case EFT might be worse) so instead of fighting each other we should unite and focus on how to make our beloved Delta Canards better
6 Likes
Yet you guys put the report in to have them added.
Im genuinely perplexed by the Rafale community.
Lets not get toxic, enough of that around.
The MICA with correct stats would be too good at everything and Gaijin have for whatever reason likely to not upset the Su and F-15 guys have held back both the Rafale and the Typhoon.
1 Like
I am all for that!
1 Like
We cannot control that a minority decided to put in reports that are technically accurate. The French rafale is technically able to take this.
Mostly from Pommie EFT folk wandering in as though they’re still salty from losing the 100 year war.
MICA with correct stats may be, MICA with half competent range instead of this hard limited rubbish that can barely reach 10km would not be excessive at everything. They’ve already demonstrated with the addition of the 77-1 that they’re comfortable with missiles performing good enough in both facets, and little you will face pulls hard enough to warrant the MICAs agility when compared to a 77-1.
In the face of 77-1 arriving and being more or less on parity with the AMRAAM, and with adequate agility in the short range to functionally perform the same role as MICA (if you are in the areas where MICA’s agility is actually necessary, it is 50/50 on whether or not in spins out) it is completely justifiable to give MICA at least some range.
2 Likes