You asked for comparisons, I gave you comparisons. Just goes to show how hypocritical you are.
Oh so you knew about it and pretended not to? Not only are you hypocritical, you’re intellectually dishonest as well.
A 120 down low is very easy to defeat there is a world where a MICA lofted has more chance of hitting the jet.
If I’m down low in the Typhoon I’m trying to use the 9M.
The MICA is superior in the head on regime at low altitude too.
It does a Radar fix is all the EF players want, Yes Gaijin have changed a code I think it’s to allow any SPAA/SAM to be able to target and destroy missiles/bombs.
In doing this it appears they have changed the RCS of missiles. Radars in TWS mode try to lock missiles and not the aircraft that shot them. Typhoon (and others) is the refresh rate in TWS mode. You simply have to use the Radar in the narrow scope and hope if you are planning on BVR get there faster and loose your missiles before they shoot theirs.
Where does that even come from lmao.
Down low, the seakers work exactly the same way. You can loft the MICA, maybe, but it maneuvers so hard the lift will be minimal, unless you are yourself at higher altitude, in which case the aim120 lofts just as well. The only difference is that the lower explosive mass of the MICA makes it less likely to get a kill in multipath.
Otherwise, you’d be comparing maneuverability, in which case being low or high strictly does not matter.
120 doesn’t pull as hard as a MICA off the rail which is why low down and close range it is inferior to both the MICA and the R-77. The 120 will often fly into the ground even when shot from above and lofted to a target.
This discussion is going nowhere. Rafale is superior in many aspects Typhoon is better in some. There is a reason Rafale is the most played jet.
Lol
Never pretended anything, just said I don’t really feel like engaging with you as I know how this goes. Have a good one
Intellectually dishonest he says