Dassault Rafale - Variants, Characteristics, Armament and Performance

correct

But it should be 80

Thing is, at the time, we didn’t have f15 and typhoons that could give AMRAAMs as much energy as they can now

Yeah I know IRL is 80km, But now we get 8 unhistorical MICA which is way better then before so you nore going to be seeing my compain. and yeah 6 real mica would have been better for historical accuracy but I already have up on that.

They could just change the classification, they don’t have to keep it as an F3R

If they wanted to fix them, it would have been done instead of adding additional 2 missiles.
Like, whole missile has issues. From too high drag, too big diameter, wobbling even after burning out a lot, self destructing at 50km to spinning if launched at low speeds… That thing is wrong in everything exept its looks. We need whole new mica at this point, not simple fix. Preferably something that can automatically switch off TVC a limit itself to 35Gs at long range non off bore shots.

4 Likes

We need F4.1 for when we get METEOR and F4.2 for MICA-NG

Shoulda been a MICA fix instead of 8 MICA. That way the Mirage 2000-5F wins, the -5Ei wins, the future MICA-slinging planes win (Mirage F2000 when), future Rafales win…

3 Likes

15C MSIP II was capable of doing it even then, it just took a bit more time. It was blatantly broken in sim where you can sideclimb over your airfields, then gain mach 2 and rain hell on top of enemy team.

1 Like

It’s Gaijin, they’ll just call it F4.1 (late) and put it behind 440k RP lmao.

If… IF they ever fix mica, they can take these 2 away or remove them from wingtips and force magic IIs there.
But as of now, fix is probably not on their minds so atleast, we get more missiles to lob at range and get decent position for once by pressuring enemy. Now you have to conserve your missiles and wait for high PK shots which puts you into insane disadvantage and defensive position.

2 Likes

More missiles is better than nothing, we won’t see a realistic MICA for a while

This makes no one happy at all, but yeah, at this point let’s just cut out the slop and call it the F.4.1 rather than Frankenstein it. They can do what they always have for the French TT like with the F1 and Super Étendard, and add in earlier variants like the F.2.2 and F.3R many years too late. And then just like the -5F they’ll add Meteors next year or add a second plane and call it the F.4.1 (Late) or something leaving everyone disappointed. And French players will just make do as they always have.

1 Like

Eurofigher bros must be fumming rn because of the 2x extra micas 😂

1 Like

Please correct the tearing speed of the plane, 1458 km\h is a dizzying nightmare!

Respectfully

1 Like

Stop whining man. “The french players wanted a F2.2” no it’s just you and a small minority.

I don’t care what version we get, all I care about is that if it’s the top dog for the french tree then it has to be able to hold its own against other top dogs, in one way or another.

13 Likes

I wanted it too, it makes sense. Accurately modeled PESA, the IR AASM, 6 MICA that are deserving of a buff, SPECTRA suite, it would be great

1 Like

Where does this come from i can’t find that in any changelog ?

It’s a datamine

I honestly think it’s some kind of act at this point

Just curious, in IRL (cause gaijin won’t model in half of its features), what does SPECTRA do?

Its a self protection system that will automatically jam enemy radars. At least that is the super short awnser. Someone else can probably give a better explanation!