Any changes to loadouts are not “instead of” other fixes. If something is incorrect with a missile and a report is up, that will be separately reviewed and investigated.
Also 8 days ago, you were one of the people requesting an x 8 MICA loadout: Community Bug Reporting System
Are we getting 4.1 Rafael?
No. We have Rafale F.3R
Well @DirectSupport made reports back at Seek and Destroy update and they still are pending while MICA needs those range fixes. Plus the devs putting a 50km range limit on the missile is one of the most important issues but it’s still not fixed while this limitation is purely fake. Limitation of a missile range is the battery time not travel distance.
Would it be rude to say do it faster in this scenario
Because I would like this done very much faster
Sadly it would be great if everything could be done faster, but its not always possible. However the 8 MICA is not connected to any performance reports.
Do you have any informations on general how/if issues relative to TVC missiles in live environments are being worked on and/or could be fixed in the future ?
I know this is hard stuff to implement correctly, especially in live environment, but instability issues concerning high maneuvering missiles, and especially TVC missiles is only going to get more prevalent as we move forward in the missile technology
Networking, jamming, IFF, closed loop sensor data fusion, all that stuff
Yeah, well, I changed my mind when I found out it wasn’t actually accurate. Also you can’t deny 8 missiles instead of 6 could lead to a higher win rate which has been used to deny fixes to vehicles before, regardless of user error/performance
I did see you say its not performance connected, but that’s after I said it was either/or
Spin out improvements are always something that are attempted where its possible to do so. Its always best to report any instances you get with the replay and clog, so it can provide the devs with some more evidence. In some situations there may be little that can be done, but its always good to get any suspicious cases checked.
Will the plane’s roundels be changed to match India’s?
Because historically only Indian F3Rs had the 8 missile configuration
Well done, this is a Dassault and DGA stand, not the French army, it is a demonstration aircraft for sale, not what equips the French army.
the ONLY F3Rs you will see with 8 missiles are either those of Dassault and DGA or those of India
Thats a F.4.1
What I learned: we need nanny pod in this game, that’s clearly the best takeaway
Trees are country trees, not army trees
Yes I know, and it was delivered on March 2, 2023 for entry into service in 2024/2025.
I was responding to the fact that the person said that only the Indian version could carry 8 missiles.
Precisely, you have to dissect the nation builders, otherwise you add the Israeli missiles on all the F16s in the game and the same for the MAW of the Belgian version.
Only the Indian F3R, the French F4.1 can
what kind of nonsense is that
Ive seen people saying that they want 2 more micas and that we got them people are complaining. Im happy we got 8 missiles and now i will stop grinding for Eurofighter and start for Rafale. I just hope Gaijin wont change their mind