Dassault Rafale - Variants, Characteristics, Armament and Performance

My point is that they’re perfectly capable of 20km shots, and that’s essentially the longest effective range in ARB anyway for most missile, because people tends to dodge anything launched from further away (assuming they aren’t bots, there’s a lot of them, granted).

I scored some 35-40km kills with the Aim7F, and that missile, as good as it is, is basically completely out of juice after 20km. It’s not representative of anything.

But people are seriously naive if they think Gaijin would give MICA the range of an AMRAAM. It’s simply a matter of balancing things. They won’t give the best long range missile to the current best brawler. They already did that mistake to the F16C-F15C when Fox 3 were added.

i heard somewhere that gaijin doesnt balance missile and goes off purely kinematics. so like?

Yeah seems like it will finally get 8 mica.

Spoiler

There ya go, F4.1 but just not with the name now.

4 Likes

Yeah, below 20km, its fine, not perfect but fine, its best below 15.
But if you want BVR, you need something that keeps energy at range. And even in RB, BVR is often 40-60km. Mica is outright incapable of shots like these with solid PK unlike amraam or PL-12 and i would say even derby is somewhat decent there. Cant say for R77 as its in same group as mica, shortly after burning out - stone.

4 Likes

Where are you getting these :D

Spoiler


9e7qxh

5 Likes

Why have I even done my work just to get another Frankenstein non-sense.

Bruh…

16 Likes

less good flares

We really need ability to select in mixed configurations. Large x32 all the way

Cuz the french players asked for this and so the french players got it?

Yea, who cares about future addtions anyway. Whats even the point to hold back the F.4.1 now, seriously.

All they need to change now is the model of the IRST, add AASM-1000 and you have a full F.4.1…

9 Likes

They should just have made it F.4.1 at the start, there would be no questions no problems, it would be still the same story about mica not performing well at all and there would be 75% less activity in here and that would be it.

But yeah 6 bad missiles was not 14.0 worthy at all that is for sure.

don’t give them ideas X)

Next thing you know, a meteor is going to pop up on these discord datamines

That’s really the thing i don’t like with these addition most of the time : new shiny things wich are broken, instead of more reasonable but less impressive stuff which works as it should

1 Like

I mean, the F.4 will likely come when they plan to introduce new missiles

It should have been even pesa version, but with correct mica. But if they cant get mica right for BVR engagements, nothing more than having more of them cant be done exept lowering BR but 13.7 wont matter anyway until we get to 14.7 so in next 3 years.

1 Like

Oh yay, they can now throw out historical accuracy because who cares about that lmao. Looks like we won’t be getting a MICA fix too because “muh 8 missiles”!

Do people not know what is best for them?

2 Likes

There won’t be a mica fix because the mica working well would depend on gaijin having better servers it is as simple as that.

not what French players asked,… in the basis, i was ok for F.2.2,…
no interest to add earlier variants now and make France not interesting for the next 20 years of the game.

not at all

The range is hard capped at 50.8km and the drag is too high, none of which are server issues

4 Likes

Or giving the MICA its extra 37.5% of range it lacks and numerous other modeling issues that aren’t a cause of the server…

5 Likes