This major update just gets dumber everytime I look lmao
3 Likes
Those are servers issues, that is why r73 and mica were working well on devserver.
It wobbles too much in live server and loose big amount of speed but yeah those are things to solve too but putting it at 80km won’t change it as it would loose all the speed that way too.
the job was done behind your back?
the only thing we can wait now is B and M variants,… then it will be over,…
Works well on test drive too
Yes, test drive and devserver works well.
No matter how many times you repeat it : no those are not server issues.
The MICA can reach 50.8km is fired high (10km) and fast (mach 2), and no matter its speed, no matter its time of flight, it will just self explode at that point.
Then there’s the ridiculous deceleration, which occurs AFTER the burner is off (meaning the TVC has nothing to do with it). Only other possible explanation : the drag is too high (oh and the diameter is still 165 instead of 160mm)
4 Likes
Obviously. Turning a semi-accurate F.3R into an F.3R / F.4.1 hybrid is definitely not my idea…
9 Likes
no it’s not,… it’s within it’s flight model:
MICA-EM Flight model data is showing 50km (the +0.8km dedale_stargate was speaking about is the time missile activate self destruct sequence)
2 Likes
I dont think we would have had that fix anyway. Only fix is to have TVC and non TVC micas. I dunno if they can make them so its decided during launch which file would be used based on range of launch but as of now, they would have to ridiculously reduce its drag where it would be probably broken if launched at like 12-15km of alt, another thing is loft, it pretty much doesnt loft.
1 Like
I just saw the news, sorry to see that everything you did is going to be overlooked
1 Like
I thought it has always been 50KM?
In game, yes. Irl? No, it should be around 80km
To anyone of any significance reading this thread:
We DO NOT want 2 extra fake missiles, I know it is difficult to research but we have provided you with numerous sources. We want a fixed MICA, please. It doesn’t matter if you have to mess around with TVC outside of X range as @MysteriousHonza said.
8 Likes
correct
But it should be 80
Thing is, at the time, we didn’t have f15 and typhoons that could give AMRAAMs as much energy as they can now
Yeah I know IRL is 80km, But now we get 8 unhistorical MICA which is way better then before so you nore going to be seeing my compain. and yeah 6 real mica would have been better for historical accuracy but I already have up on that.
They could just change the classification, they don’t have to keep it as an F3R
If they wanted to fix them, it would have been done instead of adding additional 2 missiles.
Like, whole missile has issues. From too high drag, too big diameter, wobbling even after burning out a lot, self destructing at 50km to spinning if launched at low speeds… That thing is wrong in everything exept its looks. We need whole new mica at this point, not simple fix. Preferably something that can automatically switch off TVC a limit itself to 35Gs at long range non off bore shots.
5 Likes
We need F4.1 for when we get METEOR and F4.2 for MICA-NG
Shoulda been a MICA fix instead of 8 MICA. That way the Mirage 2000-5F wins, the -5Ei wins, the future MICA-slinging planes win (Mirage F2000 when), future Rafales win…
4 Likes
15C MSIP II was capable of doing it even then, it just took a bit more time. It was blatantly broken in sim where you can sideclimb over your airfields, then gain mach 2 and rain hell on top of enemy team.
1 Like