Once I needed to shoot down an MQ-1 drone that was 10 kilometers away. I launched MICA, and it took a whole minute to reach the drone. As if the missile was flying with a speed of hellfire for whatever reason😭
The french models of the Rafale with HMD were the F4.1 standards per the bug report, not the F3R we have in-game.
You just want the Rafale to conform to what your idea of what it should be is, which is fine, thats what were all arguably doing, but pretending you’re opinion is the only right one is silly.
- Id rather it be modelled in its historically accurate config. No HMD, 6 accurately modelled MICA EM’s.
- You want it modelled to get what is ideally the best it could likely have in-game. Unhistorical HMD and 6x accurately modelled MICA-EM’s.
- They want it modelled at the absolute peak of its potential. Unhistorical HMD, 8 accurately modelled MICA-EM’s. (Really they just want an F4.1)
Disagreeing with others is fine. Chill a little.
6 Likes
Well, in terms of keeping track across large area, its best radar on top tier. You can track someone on deck and at 10 000 meters without issues.
- Research Thai Subtree now and Rafale once event starts
- Research Rafale now and Thai subtree once event starts
0
voters
I’m more inclined to the former to give some more time for bug fixes to go through
I dont think it will receive more significant fixes, We might need to wait for proper aesa model but how it works RN after fix, for me, its best radar at top tier.
I dont need a copy past sup tree for japan. I will just pray we will get south korea ;(
Can I get HMD and 8 current MICA?
1 Like
I think its azimuth limits are also too high. iirc physical limitations of stationnary AESA’s are ±60°, and at those amgles the range falls off already.
I’d have to find the source for that tho.
Give us either 6 correct micas + HMD or 8 current ones + HMD
3 Likes
Arguably more balanced than HMD + 6 fixed MICA’s tbf. Probs more likely in the near-ish future.
Seems a tad greedy lmao
±70° on RBE2 AESA, but you lose range quicker near the limits, which really doesn’t matter since it is mainly useful for close range anyway
Okay so hear me out 6 missiles, No HMD but we get Meteor and MICA-IR. That would be the historical/real loadout. XD
4 Likes
No… its perfectly balanced to remaining top tiers.
Double racks on SM? Even though they physically cant be used on it?
F-15C from 90s spec with JHMCS and jdams?
Gripen A with HMD???
2000-5s with HMD???
F-4J with HMS - tested and then thrown away.
Get out of there with 100% correct rafale when there is pretty much NOTHING at top tier which is correct.
8 Likes
Bull according to whome ? Like i would really like to know who has more authority / credibility / knowledge on the matter than Armee de l’Air to make that statement ? Truth is we simply don’t know , there is no public documentation on it other than the official statements …
Note the smooth track until notched.
4 Likes
If you want to start a riot with everyone else in the game targeting French players, sure lol.
You can track like this whole enemy team, no matter altitude as long as they are in those vertical 30° and 70° horizontal. Now we just miss decent BVR weapon.
Thats technically a Gripen A+ so A model modified to C standards.
Needs name change to Mk.2 tbf
Service HMS. F-14 was the one that never deployed it in active units
1 Like
Mk.2 is a two seater tho? right?