Hopefully I will manage another 1000 kills before this goes live.
1 Like
but why?
Because Feetpics wants us to know about his report and that they were forwarded, so I think it’s important we give the report the attention it deserves. Plus this report will determine if we keep the same performance we see on the dev-server or not, and I would like to see how many people are subscribed to the report.
then we could send it up to you via PM, instead of flooding this thread, no?
That works too
also,… since the Bug Report been accepted, i don’t see any reason to go forward with suscribing,…
To me it smells like some ulterior motive
Even if it wasn’t accepted, why would he want screenshots of ppl subscribing to a bug report, that isn’t even his
6 Likes
there was a post, now hidden, about some angry talks going on WTUD Discord.
but this thread don’t need to be flooded, if anything, DirectSupport and Feetpics needs to talk to each other through the WTUD Discord - this “war” going on isn’t a WT.forum one, and shouldn’t become one.
Im gonna make one for r-73 now, didn’t know this could be reported
6 Likes
btw, how did you get this without using datamines?
“Currently the thrust-vectoring angle of MICA is only 2.25 degrees”
I’m sure DirectSupport definitely used a compass to check max jet deflection compared to the missile, and totally never used datelined values to make said report!
7 Likes
time for me to lock in
@FeetPics do you know if the air macchi chart is made with actual tested values or just calculated values similar to the British mod docs?
From what i heard about this source or any sources except the video of the turn from RSD Feetpics use everything is based on calculation/requirements from a doc exchange (That basically occured before the first proto of Rafale even flew) between France and Great Britain. Basically except for the video the documents he uses hold no value.
This is incorrect. British document is from 1992 which is after Rafale first flight and after information about engine performance was public knowledge.
Even then most of the MOD document about Rafale are only filled with requirement data not actual flight data.
When will the moderator ban people who keep flaming this thread? The early thread was great although pretty deserted because people trying to actual discussing, now it’s coming back like the part 1 thread. Wow, can’t have sht in Rafale thread, everytime you talk something good about Rafale, then instantly several persistent people coming here to gatekeep Rafale for whatever the hell reason they had.
And although liking comment does pretty much nothing to affirm their commitment to the rule, I guess it could be taken into consideration that these people really don’t care about the rules in this forum.
7 Likes
Cause we still talk about the rafale.
We talk about its overperformance and how that shiuld be fixed.
That is in fact on topic. If you like it or not
Would we change the topic to other aircrafts. Then yes it can and should be removed as off topic.
But what you are trying is to misuse thw rules for your own benefit
5 Likes