This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
5 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
@FeetPics do you know if the air macchi chart is made with actual tested values or just calculated values similar to the British mod docs?
From what i heard about this source or any sources except the video of the turn from RSD Feetpics use everything is based on calculation/requirements from a doc exchange (That basically occured before the first proto of Rafale even flew) between France and Great Britain. Basically except for the video the documents he uses hold no value.
This is incorrect. British document is from 1992 which is after Rafale first flight and after information about engine performance was public knowledge.
Even then most of the MOD document about Rafale are only filled with requirement data not actual flight data.
When will the moderator ban people who keep flaming this thread? The early thread was great although pretty deserted because people trying to actual discussing, now it’s coming back like the part 1 thread. Wow, can’t have sht in Rafale thread, everytime you talk something good about Rafale, then instantly several persistent people coming here to gatekeep Rafale for whatever the hell reason they had.
And although liking comment does pretty much nothing to affirm their commitment to the rule, I guess it could be taken into consideration that these people really don’t care about the rules in this forum.
7 Likes
Cause we still talk about the rafale.
We talk about its overperformance and how that shiuld be fixed.
That is in fact on topic. If you like it or not
Would we change the topic to other aircrafts. Then yes it can and should be removed as off topic.
But what you are trying is to misuse thw rules for your own benefit
4 Likes
Surely, for example: accusing everyone defending Rafale here as French Nationalist/Elitist is on topic.
I’m fine with overperforming talks, but when it started calling each other name is totally nonsensical.
3 Likes
Differentation.
That is innapropiate and should be removed.
Its another reason then off topic.
That are 2 different instances of “rule breaking” and have nothing to do with each other
That’s why I said it was about flaming, you know what flaming means right?
1 Like
You posted a staff enforcement quote about off topic
Thats what i went with.
This and that have nothing to do with each other
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
And that is going off topic.
I didnt even complain about the rafale right now in any way. Thats your fantasy playing with you.
I only responded to the current issue at hand in this thread
I said sweden cant get the Iris-t slm yet. Cause they or any related nation dont own them yet.
Dont take your personal issues in this thread.
1 Like
Dude, flaming is also off-topic, idk what were you smoking if you don’t think so.
1 Like