Hey smin how’s your day?
Its been a long one, thats for sure.
6 Likes
The irony, i hear many frenchs @Hyrikul crying, whats with the leclercs and them not getting roof mounted mgs then?
So then if it has a gun is that technically different enough to add it as a new vehicle? So why not just add the KV-1B with a roof gun or the aforementioned 3rd finnish KV-1 with front turret armor?
They have coax .50s cleary thats enough /s
Double shift in RRD
As we have mentioned multiple times now, we do not have any current plans for the KV-1B. Ive answered you multiple times on this. I appreciate you really want to see it, but spamming me about it sadly isnt going to change that.
Right now we are introducing this new KV-1 for Finland.
2 Likes
Thanks for answer.
and soon to be in the sovjet tree xD
shame, would have been a good chance for a unique finnish one considering ussr alreads has so many variants
My problem is if gaijin really cared why not add a vehicle that has a existing lineup? This vehicle will either be 4.7 since its slightly better armor than the KV-1 zis 5 only until he angles which means hes better or its at 5.0, regardless this thing wont have a actual lineuo which is my problem. Especially when both KV-1’s are important to fi nish history during WW2 considering they are the only heavy tanks that were inservice outside of the 3rd KV-1 which finnish crew had to destroy to prevent capture.
No one should be locked out of their tank regardless of nation
i have so many bad examples sadly
Oh i know
You have made your feedback and feelings very clear on the matter across multiple posts and on Reddit too. Trust me its been understood.
Right now however, again, we have this new KV-1 coming in this major. Thats the current focus. We have considerations to take into account regarding the KV-1B and players that have that.
1 Like
Afaik Gaijin official reason for Leclercs laking roof MG is that IRL Leclercs are hermetically sealed an under pressure during combat, for bacteriological, nuclear, etc. protection. Forget the exact term (NBC thing), hence also why we don’t use bore evacuator on our gun, we use the pressure inside the tank.
The funny thing is that it’s still a sad excuse not to put them on, knowing that a lot of other tanks have MGs that are activated “by magic” ingame, without a crew behind.
And if the Leclercs’ excuse is really their point of view, then maybe they need to remove a good chunk of AA from all ships, because AA stations aren’t used when the big guns are firing.
And this don’t answer also for all the Amx-50s/lorraine/other tank lacking their MG or canon x)
4 Likes
doesnt literaly every tank need to be ABC rated at this day and age?
thought that was a normal thing
1 Like
Its just silly to me that you would add it without a lineup. And so far finland has been exclusively used as a cash grab for their unique vehciles with a handful being prem/event. If we had Stu 40 or either of the T34 76 747
To go with it it wouldve made sense.
We don’t rule out further Finnish vehicles in the future.
2 Likes
You’re also a moderator on the Reddit forum? Damn, even more reading…
Aaaaaand that looks like one I’ll be repossessing