They had pretty good hitrates in testing against target drones. 95%. Which blows the “falls off the rail half the time” story which gets perpetuated too often out of the water.
Sim players at BR’s where I’d use AIM-4’s also fly like target drones so I don’t see the problem with these.
These would indeed perform much better. Hopefully if they add these they’ll give us the original AIM’s too. Event F-89D with 6 of them or something because I know they won’t want to make a new airframe for them like the F-101/2/6.
And yes, this above anything else. Pretty sure some people would’ve argued that the R.511 is useless but in sim it absolutely wrecks.
Concerning TrickZZter isn’t up to his job As an issue reviewer, he irresponsibly and arbitrarily denied compliance materials, and I think he can’t even understand the Chinese materials submitted by Chinese players, and is no longer suitable to continue as a manager
Not sure what’s going on but I can imagine that is hard to accept materials with such a different alphabet. Should have a Chinese speaking person review those.
He denied almost all the issues about repairing the performance of the Chinese J10A, and many of the photos we found in the magazine were completely ignored
J10A as an active vehicle, we can’t find the core technical data, we can only find the data in some popular science magazines, we did everything we could but he denied all our efforts!
there’s your problem. Gaijin won’t/can’t except magazines as sources because of reasons
Reason 1: Not an official document.
Reason 2: Not a source document
