All I know from the stream is that the 111C has considerably more flares.
1 Like
What performance?
Oops i had a typo i was asking if they would have the same performance
seems to be the only diffrence from what we saw in the stream
the DS will clarify things but it still isnt open
1 Like
Baba Yaga
Slavic folklore being
Halloween related
1 Like
looks that way
i saw something about aoa vapor, is this true?
F-111F should have much better acceleration and probably climb rate due to its engines producing 9000-10000 lbf more (static) thrust compared to the F-111C
1 Like
Why tho? The K is just a worse G in WT at least. At least the D can be carried in triples, the K can not, it would just serve as a useless downgrade option to the G, unless they completely alter how the CCD seeker performs.
Not exactly the Baba Yaga, but her home, the Hut on Chicken legs
2 Likes
Love it
CBT time
so, is the dev server on?
They both get the better engines
wasnt a few min ago
update is there thoi
net yet it seems
That’s wrong then, the F-111C only had ~20500 lbf per engine, using the old F-111A body with slightly uprated engines compared to the 18500 lbf as on the F-111A.
Say it with me people,
“everything on the dev server is subject to change”.
2 Likes
Exactly!
Considering we don’t even have our own missile ship yet, I’m not even worried about Radar guidance or Chaff. I just want one in game
You must be optimistic to believe that, I wish I was as well. But I don’t trust them.