They are working on it…like on new light vehicles for UK…or France…or implementing original vehicles to sub-tt…filling SPAA gaps that still most TTs have.
AV-8B+ also has FLIR, the same one I’m pretty sure
None at all for any reason… **** would be fine, but should PM us Moderators for questions and we can answer in the future
1 Like
Well, now you’ve cursed the Saudi Tornado to be 11.7
Will do, Thanks!
1 Like
They don’t need it since a ton of BR 11 things have came in like there 3 of them and mostly strike and bombers.
Yeah…
Anytime! o7
They sure are working on something…
The US had their own counterpart so I guess that is why.
Also I hope they play around with the BRs a bit more, because the 111F seems a lot better than the 111C, especially if they change/fix the countermeasure amount. They shouldn’t really be at the same BR.
Meanwhile, I’m glad to see the Aussie F-111C in the UK tree. A decision that makes sense for once.
1 Like
Wonder why did they decided to add it into the UK tt this time
Would you remind me what the buff was?
The only recent change I remember is Gaijin adding the bomb dropping speed limit to them.
Cause there apparently are no rules
They have somewhat fixed the leading edge wing slats… So you can pull more instaneous Gs but bleed speed a bit faster. You can also deploy combat flaps at a greater wing sweep
I mean this was already obvious for a long time, ever since Smin said that they would just add Australian and Canadian vehicles wherever they felt like.
It’s just that people here like to make up fantasy rules.
4 Likes
I wonder why after they added a second F-111 and a new AV-8 both at BR 11.
Oh, aight, no wonder I didn’t notice/remember that
Im sure there are rules…but they dont count every time
I ment that it is owned by Australia, but US vehicle. Last time it was like that it went to US because US made it