Mind you that by asking to respect the rules we’re not endorsing in any way any thread. IMHO this is a bad idea as it would further make TT’s identities mixed, which again IMHO is not good for the game.
Whether these messages are against the guidelines or not (I’ll look now), may I remind you that you can flag them so that we can spot them more easily… it’s the entire point of the flag function.
Of course not, because all of them are just USSR vehicles at best. And even then the Egyptan M4 FL10 fell to France as developer, not the USSR. Because there is no logic in applying nations, devs do it as they please judging every single machine by itself
aha, but 2a4 never went to USA (2AV is STILL german even if it was proposed to US and was practically an abrams prototype) or USSR, tho many of “warsaw pact” use the 2a4s. Finland went to Sweden for some reason, Hungary went to Italy, Estonia does not exist still but unlikely going to USSSR aswell, ect.
Exactly! No logical reason behind giving out the USSR techs to any other tech tree except “well uuuuuuuh”, and same with the nato standart tanks going to USSR except for several machines of “test drives”. But that logic exists ingame! I didnt implement it, the devs did.
beyond 40 years of being allies, of course. Being an ally of italy in 1941-1944 is a much better bet, uhu.
Can you unhide the comment please? I believe I removed everything required
Such freedom that the USSR basically banned us from making our own aircraft
Im simply saying that making such post isnt against the rules despite being politicaly loaded but responding to it breaks the forum rules on politics. Its nonsensical.
Glad we agree on this.
Neutral country during that time buying equipment from both iirc
Also close connections with other nordic countries IMO sweden should be renamed to Nordics or scandinavia
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
i wanna downvote this
That wasnt alliance, that was occupation.
What?
Uhm, I think we are a bit off set innit?
There’s nothing but facts in the first part of the sentence and then speculation with the second one. Nothing political with the thread itself. Whether the users then use politics to approve or disprove the thread, that is another issue.
Vote in my poll above
well, thats a fair point, tho still its being used as the NATO ally in the game balancer logic. USSR hardly plays as ally of Sweden ingame, maybe when its all-against-all. Plus the finnish tree is as small as can be, and cound easilly be added without the USSR-issued machinery, keepin only the trophies of WW2
Ah, since its “speculating” it doesnt break any forum rules, I get it.
The OP is speculating whether the vehicles of a certain nation (due to one of them already being in the TT itself) could end up in a TT, how is that political?
Once again, you’re seeing this as political due to your perspective on it. The OP has just speculated where these vehicles might end up based on the fact that one/two of them is already there.
Let’s not twist words, thank you.
I’d rather not, that would be a waste of Czechoslovakian+ successor vehicles just so USSR gets a leopard or X vehicle.
hell naw
Tbh it feels like they forgot about Romania for years considering that was the first Italian subtree way before Hungary and they added like 2 Romanian planes before Hungary iirc.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.