Then such ragebait topics shouldnt be even allowed.
Well then maybe delete the messages trying to frame soviet occupation of eastern europe as some type of happy, mutual friendship if you dont want this thread to devolve into politics
We’ll deal with messages if those are against the guidelines. There’s no need to press us to do so.
This topic is the OP’s opinion and the chance to talk about the 2A8, it’s not against the guidelines to have an opinion is it? (it doesn’t offend anyone).
1 Like
I’ve mostly seen people being upset with Hungary joining the Italy because it would be one of the cornerstones of Visegrad group TT (HU/PL/CZ/SK), and this way we are left with CZ/SK/PL (which is fine anyway)
But yeah, I can see keeping Romania as sub-tree for Italy because Romanians have more modified and domestic post-WW2/cold war tech in both air and ground to make up for a really great sub-tree. It is just that Gaijin mostly relies on C&P where it can be placed in order to save resources and time
1 Like
It offends me. But oh well since its due to historical reasons, its okay to do so.
So these qoutes are apolitical and fine but pointing to how that "alliance" really was is not? Good to know
1 Like
Mind you that by asking to respect the rules we’re not endorsing in any way any thread. IMHO this is a bad idea as it would further make TT’s identities mixed, which again IMHO is not good for the game.
Whether these messages are against the guidelines or not (I’ll look now), may I remind you that you can flag them so that we can spot them more easily… it’s the entire point of the flag function.
Of course not, because all of them are just USSR vehicles at best. And even then the Egyptan M4 FL10 fell to France as developer, not the USSR. Because there is no logic in applying nations, devs do it as they please judging every single machine by itself
aha, but 2a4 never went to USA (2AV is STILL german even if it was proposed to US and was practically an abrams prototype) or USSR, tho many of “warsaw pact” use the 2a4s. Finland went to Sweden for some reason, Hungary went to Italy, Estonia does not exist still but unlikely going to USSSR aswell, ect.
Exactly! No logical reason behind giving out the USSR techs to any other tech tree except “well uuuuuuuh”, and same with the nato standart tanks going to USSR except for several machines of “test drives”. But that logic exists ingame! I didnt implement it, the devs did.
beyond 40 years of being allies, of course. Being an ally of italy in 1941-1944 is a much better bet, uhu.
Can you unhide the comment please? I believe I removed everything required
Such freedom that the USSR basically banned us from making our own aircraft
1 Like
Im simply saying that making such post isnt against the rules despite being politicaly loaded but responding to it breaks the forum rules on politics. Its nonsensical.
Glad we agree on this.
Neutral country during that time buying equipment from both iirc
Also close connections with other nordic countries IMO sweden should be renamed to Nordics or scandinavia
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
i wanna downvote this
That wasnt alliance, that was occupation.
2 Likes
What?
1 Like
Uhm, I think we are a bit off set innit?
There’s nothing but facts in the first part of the sentence and then speculation with the second one. Nothing political with the thread itself. Whether the users then use politics to approve or disprove the thread, that is another issue.
Vote in my poll above