It’s confirmed they’re never giving CV90s air tracking, so you’ll just have to make-do with the 9035’s proxy ammo…which it doesn’t have on the dev.
so is 10.0 still justified?
I guess that its quite fast shooting
Idk of the 9040’s are jist better i dont think its worth it.
It’s not really worth getting unless people plan to speedrun to top tier, in which case they’d buy this and the 105
Arcade stats.
but currently its too slow on test server, its original horsepower and tonnage from danish army websites, puts it at a 20-35% HP/Tonnage advantage over the regular CV9040 series.
on top of that, its shown on varrious pictures using slat and composite armor packages.
and is suposed to have APFSDS not just apds (so currently wrong ammo + wrong armor + wrong hp/tonnage) in ground RB, and its stats in arcade i cant comment on since arcade spec lines seems made up anyhow.
Its gunsight is also off center/messed up atm in the dev server. so a lot of fixes are needed,
- real model has laser warning system, + commander/gunner gun system + commander gunner Gen3 thermal, + spallliners (its a more modern tank than most of the CV9040´s we have in game), but is chain-cannon based dual 70round belt feed, with acces to burst muniton vs air, + autotarget tracking system. You can ez find pictures on google showing it used in aufganistan using the armor package systems i mentioned earlier btw.
1 Like
Make a bug report, im not familiar with the cv9035’s
Might be the version they are going for, idk if Denmark used one variant or at some point might have upgraded them
They could be basing it off the very first version without the upgrades like the bolted on armor, slat armor, upgraded engine and ammo
Or maybe some of those were always there by default
Edit:
at least give it the darn slat
2 Likes
Bug report and ask is all i can say
Don’t know enough about the engine to make a report
As for the rest, it will probably fall into the “Not a bug” section since i’m guessing they simply left these out on purpose for a reason
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1d55hjb/seems_gaijin_is_testing_ahead_rounds_in_dev/
IRST + functioning AHEAD?
Once the CV90 with the D turret comes around they will get airtracking but for now sadly no even tho the UTAAS does have it :(
The vehicle is not finished yet remember this! It most likely will get APSFDS, Proximity fuze for aircrafts and 3rd gen thermals once it’s finished.
So the current in dev server is lacking of the thermal, ammo and LRF? Right?
Yes amongst others
what kind of performance we would expect from this 35mm apfsds
40mm one is 170mm flat
the number i see on the internet for A kind of 35mm AFPSDS is 130mm. That would bring it closer to CV9030 in anti tank
It has the same ammo as the Gepard and the Marksman, currently.
The type 89 on japan at 9.0 has the same gun then which if this thing isnt getting a firepower increase it will be meh. Honestly higher rpm over pen any day for me but its a pretty good round imo
APFSDS on 35mm we dont have that
Did’nt see any ABM ammunition either so i do hope they dont forget about the KETF or AHEAD for the vehicle. Regarding the APSFDS round it feels like its a bit lacklusting in penetration but we will have to see
1 Like
Hm i also noticed that it only has 35 rounds then it has to reload, it should be a total of 70 rounds. Maybe i should go and prepare a bug report already :)
1 Like