I get it, i do. But when i put a lot of effort into trying to find good sources, help others find sources and write well written bug reports, its not really encouraging to get a respons in the tone of “wont get fixed anyway” , “they wont listen” , “not a bug” , etc. It actively discourages and demotivates me (and likely others) from wanting to keep trying. Its very counterproductive to what you say you want to accomplish.
2 Likes
You make a good point and you realize why as well, and so does Phoenix it seems to me.
And as such, at the very least from my point i would like to say that our motivation might be lacking and that is mainly because of the response we have from gaijin.
We do, at least I do appreciate your perseverance and your effort and time spent in bringing them to gaijin, so from me an honest thank you for doing more than most of us.
2 Likes
And dont forget to keep upvote our bug reports! :D
Most of us are just sick of having to argue about a basic feature of functionality… So much so i refuse to buy a vehicle i want because it’s missing said features.
3 Likes
Always do
1 Like
Unfortunately not buying just makes gaijin replace the vehicle instead of fixing it, thats how they work. Its unfortunate, i just buy what i want and just hope they fix it eventually.
For newcomers, here are the links to our bug reports, even if they have been accepted please help upvote if you feel so.
CV90 Mk.IV - Search and Track function // Gaijin.net // Issues
CV90 Mk.IV - Missing ABM // Gaijin.net // Issues
Armor on the CV90 MKIV is incorrect // Gaijin.net // Issues
(Extra for the 35mm)
CV 9035DK ABM/KETF // Gaijin.net // Issues
(For any Gripen fan)
Swedish JAS39 Gripen C - Radar modell incorrect distance // Gaijin.net // Issues
9 Likes
Their loss not mine, i don’t want an unfinished vehicle.
This is starting to be a whole swedish tt community in here i love it
“Apes together strong”
3 Likes
Im not a sweden tech tree fan but its awful to see the way they treat cv90s. “Cv90s have different way of tracking - okay, we heard you, we arent adding anything at all”. “Cv9030/35s have abm - okay, we heard you, we arent adding anything at all”.
Its weird that cv90s cant even have their real features but japan tech tree, for example, gets 2 vehicles (1 is premium) made from a wooden mockup. I dont see them being unobtainable like maus, e100 or koelian, why, Gaijin? Anyway that hori thing should be discussed more in other topic.
2 Likes
They get more, but they kinda need em as tech tree fillers (R2Y2 anyone?)
But so does sweden, only nation without a single tech tree heavy.
But yeah, they are not treating the Swedish vehicles with much respect, even less so the CV90 family of vehicles.
2 Likes
Is there any information on the range of the PS-05 mk3? An educated guess would most likely put it around 180km, or perhaps even more.
At least 300km.
Dang, I was pretty close to the base version of 160km. But we’re probably not seeing the upgraded mk 3 till we get better missiles, and perhaps a JAS39C (late)?
1 Like
As with the CV90s i would like for them to actually right the version of the radar so we dont have to walk around being in the loop of “why” and building up frustration…
1 Like
Now with the release of typhoons and rafales with aesa (no matter how incomplete)
It is dubbly important to get the radars right as there is now a lot of talk about introducing EWS. And besides the F-35 big ol’ dunptrucknof a radar, we all know the ES/05a raven is currently the leading system when it comes to electronic warfare. And would tenfold the power of the gripen systems.
Nonetheless, I can realise when were getting off topic. This is about getting the CV90 family we deserve. Not about radars, gripens or EWS.
My bad.
Fingers crossed the CV9030 MK.IV gets something decent fixed tomorrow
3 Likes
Iirc it had lws on the dev server so why in gods name would that be removed on the live server the module is even there. Hopefully it will be added back
Any bug reports that were passed recently?