Dang, I was pretty close to the base version of 160km. But we’re probably not seeing the upgraded mk 3 till we get better missiles, and perhaps a JAS39C (late)?
1 Like
As with the CV90s i would like for them to actually right the version of the radar so we dont have to walk around being in the loop of “why” and building up frustration…
1 Like
Now with the release of typhoons and rafales with aesa (no matter how incomplete)
It is dubbly important to get the radars right as there is now a lot of talk about introducing EWS. And besides the F-35 big ol’ dunptrucknof a radar, we all know the ES/05a raven is currently the leading system when it comes to electronic warfare. And would tenfold the power of the gripen systems.
Nonetheless, I can realise when were getting off topic. This is about getting the CV90 family we deserve. Not about radars, gripens or EWS.
My bad.
Fingers crossed the CV9030 MK.IV gets something decent fixed tomorrow
1 Like
Iirc it had lws on the dev server so why in gods name would that be removed on the live server the module is even there. Hopefully it will be added back
Any bug reports that were passed recently?
They pulled this one back 3 days ago, but no news other than that.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gpsdynIQEnn5
These are the only two i know of:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7Fr8A6fb8sg1
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XgUBuQ1l65kD
The hilarity of it being denied using another game as a source lmafo
Why is that funny? There are very likely games out there that has vehicle named the same but has like a top speed of 200km/h and that shoots lasers when fully upgraded. Games ar quite literally not a “source” for any kind of real world information.
Gaijin do state what sources are acceptable when making reports like these:
The used a video from the game steel beasts to argue the FCS was the same… That’s why it’s hilarious.
I think that is not about the game itself but more showing what the tracking function in the CV90 is actually like IRL, that video likely wouldn’t be passed as a source had it been used for a bug report, but it is effective in describing the IRL feature and how it works.
1 Like
So why is it being used as a counter argument in a bug report… If it can’t stand on its own, that’s why i find it funny.
It isn’t. the argument is “the tracking on the CV90 is not video tracking, the tracking works like this: [video]” So where that video comes from doesn’t really matter if it is just to show how it works and not as proof that that system is what is present on the MK.IV.
The proof they are claiming is that the symbology for air tracking the laser-trig way is still present on the MK.IV and no new symbology for video-/IR-tracking is present or shown in any BAE videos.
The lack of proof for the VTM being installed is also default proof as a general rule.
Ok dude whatever you say lol
Realistically we wont see any changes for the CV9030 MK.IV for maybe a month or a year. Gaijin has to decide whether BAE marketing the CV90 MK.IV chassis as Stanag level 6 is a clear marketing lie along with the turret. As the MK.IV is nearly the same dimensions as the CV90 MK.III chassis, additionally gaijin will need to model and create the 30mm ABM which as it stands rn are worthless more the vehicle as gaijin doesnt even model AHEAD right
Its just a low grain HE VT rn so it does nearly nothing damage wise. Again for now the MK.IV should be dropped to 10.0 or 9.7 as it has less survivability then the vilkas and only has 2 more spikes in total. Realistically if they give it AA tracking and fixed armor id be fine with it at 10.3, right now it has no real reason imo to be higher than the QN506 which imo is a better vehicle.
IMO gaijin looked at the Dutch CV9035 with the PRO armor and figured it clearly is a marketing lie and so gave the MK.IV the same armor as that. Honestly at this point get rid of the 30mm and add the 35mm as that will fix the most useless part of the vehicle and make it actually viable since gaijin has yet to bother fixing the vehicle in the slightest.
This vehicle should have been added next update or so, that way gaijin could spend more time, unfortunately it would’ve come out the same unbaked garbage it currently is.
Side note anyone know if this model can use the drones to lock on for the spikes or if thats exclusive to the 35/50mm turret models.
1 Like
Do you mean like a LOAL thing?
I think he means more of a datalink type of think like the AKERON has.
Yeah i believe its only with akeron