This model iirc never had APS, though be ready six years from now when they add the 9035 MK.IV as a prem for 400 krone for it to not have APS because logic
Realistically this thing should be the lowest BR spike carrier with how its worse than every other Spike vehicle in the 10.x range, no armor, no spall liner, no AA, no survivability, no speed
Not really sure it’s even worth the 10.0 in its current state.
Definitely not, again id say it could’ve been a side grade to the BILL but the BILL rn is better in everyway minus the stabilizer and sits at 10.3
It’s not even that much better than the other 30mm one, unless by some miracle spikes have been unfucked. And that one’s 9.3
CV90 Mk IV In depth Video Video Shown Has Information and Video of Programable Fuse Rounds and The Director and Owner Of the Company Explains the Fire Control System and 360 Degree LWS, and Cameras. And Reduced Thermal Signature Of The Vehicle
Spikes rn have better tracking but are still inconsistent at times, with how they are positioned on the MK.IV they pretty hit or miss unless you aim your turret to the left 30°
This vehicle is realistically useless
Not saying we should have got the one Sweden actually selected, but at least that one would have actually had a place.
If it was 9.7 id say maybe with spikes its too low but considering how it fails to come close to even most 10.0 IFV’s im slowly thinking it could be 9.7
That’s the conclusion I’ve come to. Spikes really don’t carry a 9030 far enough to be 10+
Ahem, a slower 9030, 37t with 1000hp vs 27.5t 625hp
So place it at 9.3 its a slower 9030 lmao
Honestly, unless spikes have been fixed, that wouldn’t be an entirely bad spot.
That’s for the trackfire system, not the main gun of the cv90. It’s for integrating a remote turret with the existing UTAAS video tracking system.
Trackfire RWS is included in the Fire Control product portfolio, together with the Combat Vehicle 90 gunners sight Universal Tank and Anti-Aircraft System (UTAAS) and Pintle Mount products. The portfolio share common technology and sub-systems such as the fire control computer, video tracking module, recoil buffer and stabilisation technology.
So forgive me if I’m being a bit silly, but couldn’t they have given us a 50mm instead of 35mm?
They could but they chose the 30mm
Yay, intentionally giving us the one that has no place in the tree.
It technically does it just meeds some fixing and potentially a BR drop
*Yay, intentionally giving us the one that has no place in the tree with its current state
Fixed. It’d be nice if we got an upgrade for the 50mm.
It would but thats not gonna happen
