Precisely, the gunner still need to keep the “reticle” onto the target but can choose to use continuous lasing instead of manual.
I would describe as a way to automatically track the general area and approximate movement (more than the specific vehicle) that the gunner then fine tunes manually before shooting.
1 Like
So is this Post about gathering information for the CV90 Mk IV? If so will you make a detailed report to try and give it all of the capabilities it has in real life? If so I do believe that it has proxy shells or at least ones similar to AHEAD rounds seen on the puma because of videos by BAE and Ukraine War footage. The exact ammo and type as been impossible for me to track down. I do also believe it can auto track with the 5th gen sight electronics and it does have 3rd gen thermal. (BAE Marketing Pamphlet)
Well, if you read through the thread you will get all your questions answered :)
So if I am reading this right, they’ve denied the APS on account of not having the module in game, but Iron Fist is found on the challenger black night?
This model iirc never had APS, though be ready six years from now when they add the 9035 MK.IV as a prem for 400 krone for it to not have APS because logic
Realistically this thing should be the lowest BR spike carrier with how its worse than every other Spike vehicle in the 10.x range, no armor, no spall liner, no AA, no survivability, no speed
Not really sure it’s even worth the 10.0 in its current state.
Definitely not, again id say it could’ve been a side grade to the BILL but the BILL rn is better in everyway minus the stabilizer and sits at 10.3
It’s not even that much better than the other 30mm one, unless by some miracle spikes have been unfucked. And that one’s 9.3
CV90 Mk IV In depth Video Video Shown Has Information and Video of Programable Fuse Rounds and The Director and Owner Of the Company Explains the Fire Control System and 360 Degree LWS, and Cameras. And Reduced Thermal Signature Of The Vehicle
1 Like
Spikes rn have better tracking but are still inconsistent at times, with how they are positioned on the MK.IV they pretty hit or miss unless you aim your turret to the left 30°
This vehicle is realistically useless
Not saying we should have got the one Sweden actually selected, but at least that one would have actually had a place.
If it was 9.7 id say maybe with spikes its too low but considering how it fails to come close to even most 10.0 IFV’s im slowly thinking it could be 9.7
That’s the conclusion I’ve come to. Spikes really don’t carry a 9030 far enough to be 10+
Ahem, a slower 9030, 37t with 1000hp vs 27.5t 625hp
So place it at 9.3 its a slower 9030 lmao
1 Like
Honestly, unless spikes have been fixed, that wouldn’t be an entirely bad spot.
That’s for the trackfire system, not the main gun of the cv90. It’s for integrating a remote turret with the existing UTAAS video tracking system.
Trackfire RWS is included in the Fire Control product portfolio, together with the Combat Vehicle 90 gunners sight Universal Tank and Anti-Aircraft System (UTAAS) and Pintle Mount products. The portfolio share common technology and sub-systems such as the fire control computer, video tracking module, recoil buffer and stabilisation technology.
So forgive me if I’m being a bit silly, but couldn’t they have given us a 50mm instead of 35mm?
1 Like