delayed ? hello? Sorry were you excited to get a Taiwanese vehicle in game?
2 Likes
Alternatively, it could be Taiwanese people using the more active forum and using the widely accepted language for it.
That’s not our intention at all.
Oh hey, the problems that most other nations suffer from.
Can we avoid generalisations of groups of people?
8 Likes
And how would you know which of the commenters are Taiwanese, exactly?
7 Likes
First off,
I’m not a Westerner. I’m from the unrecognised Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
Secondly,
As I’ve said earlier, I am not here to provoke Chinese people. As I said, I have no problem with Chinese people.
“So why do you want it?” you ask?
Parity. ROC Flag was used in 1928-1949 Mainland China, and Taiwan is also represented in game. If it isn’t represented in this new system*, it gives Gaijin leeway to just remove other now-non-existent countries such as the USSR, Kingdom of Italy, etc.
14 Likes
Why not?
1 Like
Adding the ROC flag brings too much politics into the game, so stop doing that
2 Likes
If Gaijin is not willing to include the good China flag to be chosen or remove all the good China vehicles (Chinese three would be far more appealing to play without the copy-paste RP sinks) then let us mod the flag PNGs like we can with user skins and sights.
I’d personally replace them all with Girls und Panzer school flags.
7 Likes
Republic of China Vehicles from 1928-1949 is in game.
Taiwanese Vehicles are in game.
The flag should be in the system.
14 Likes
Political statement
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
It is called Taiwan by the International Community.
To add a flag used by China prior to the CCP?
8 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Are you sure? We were able to discuss this in a completely civil manner. Only a select few individuals have any sort of consternation about it.
1 Like
From what I’ve seen, most of the politics are brought in by a certain group of Chinese users.
13 Likes
By the United States. And the US isn’t the representative of Earth.
Yes, similarly it is controversial to add a Nazi flag
1 Like
Horrible generalization that does nothing but breed conflict.
Leopard 2SG was never coming, the Leopard 2A4 (48th SAR) was leaked.
We don’t know why it was delayed, we have no official statement or reasoning.
Most people talking about the Oplot do not want it because it is not represented accurately (Oplot-P is a unique variant) or do not want Trialed vehicles.
11 Likes
Whether it was the Japanese VT-4 controversy or this army flag issue, the chaos always seems to come from the same group of Chinese players who keep turning everything into politics.
15 Likes
That’s just racism
1 Like
Nope. The UK uses it, Europe as a whole uses it, Cyprus and the TRNC government use it, Hong Kong uses it, etc.
Except that flag is illegal in many countries and/or becoming illegal in more. It is an internationally recognised Hate Symbol, unlike the RoC flag. To compare the two is inaccurate.
1 Like
NO?
PLEASE STOP PROJECTING YOUR DELUSION TO US.
Because Singapore people didn’t want to being subtree of China
Just the same way you guys didn’t want to give Thailand VT4 to Japan
Because You guys gave cause to those damn US mains who wants to gatekeep M1A2
Because you guys gave cause for that, because of Thailand VT4.
If you guys didn’t protested about VT4, nothing would be happen at all.
“Violence begets violence”
I don’t hate China and I supports of M1A2T or Oplot-P in the same level as Thailand VT-4
9 Likes