Countermeasures pods, BOL, and other countermeausre pods. Where are they?

sort of, at least when its the Saab BOL pods specifically. Saab themselves only claim their CM systems are on F15s, F/A-18, Jas39, Eurofighter and a couple other airframes as of October last year, Historically they appeared on harriers and a few extras but as they arent really in service nowadays they don’t boast about them.

I don’t really know for other aircraft such as the F16, F2 or anything from the soviet bloc what extra countermeasure dispensers were used.
image
image

I just want them added iykwim. I feel like it would be better for the planes that get them juts to get them now even more so with the new AA.

2 Likes

more countermeasures is gonna be vital in the future, whether extra CM pods stay practically worthless like BOL currently is or not

1 Like

Change title to countermeasures pods or BOL and other countermeausre pods then

Ok did it but then we also got to talk about a lot of lower BR things missing later in life counter measures


Worse CAS in exchange for BOL makes sense tbh

The US tested their own LAU-138 BOL launchers on the F-18C, so BOL is NOT a unique Finnish modification…still waiting on a response for the US to get it, since my report was marked as duplicate despite new sources presented and the previous report is sitting in limbo as accepted since the US F-18s were added.

4 Likes

Argue that with Smin, again i can link the artificial differences post if you want to argue with Smin over that. It explains why some vehicles dont get accepted like the SAAF Gripen C not getting AIM 120 even if it can use them.

Also Smin answered that the LAU tests with the US weren’t valid enough iirc, Quartas asked earlier

1 Like

Absolutely infuriating that they refuse to give the F-18C BOL pods it should have, but then pull moves like giving Japan’s F-15 AIM-120s they only tested a few times…seemingly always the US getting the short end of the stick when it comes to ordnance used in service, trialed or prototyped (like missing LJDAMs, AH-1F’s flare dispenser, F-16C’s inner pylon for dual LGBs and PIDS pylons, F-15 BOL as well etc.)

4 Likes

Not that they weren’t enough, that there wasn’t sufficient confirmation they actually got evaluated/integrated in the end

I don’t remember everything he said but yeah thanks for clearing that up

1 Like

Yeah no worries.

Not a fan of how he only talked about the F-15E when there are 2 others that we know can use BOL though

Its just gaijin with the artificial differences, again same thing when the US got the Late and Finland got a 13.7 hornet at 14.0 well guess it still hasn’t gotten any better for that hornet lol.

Tbf i guessed this would happen but i do have a good guess why only the MLU 2 gets BOL, since its missing AIM 9X, gaijin perhaps wants to send it up in BR when they add the Super hornet, leave the Legacy hornets behind for the US and move to the super and Finland gets the MLU 2 for the next set of top fighters.

There’s one more level of legacy hornet left for the US. But Super Hornet could also happen

Eh given the leaks im leaning towards super but who knows, im just using what info i have. I dont secretly work for the snail, [
but if the snail is watching you should definitely hire me 100% ;) ]

Yeah, even if the M61A2 is for the F-2 it’s still also used on the Super Hornet.

But personally, I think next US top tier jet will be in F-16 line.

Maybe who knows, i hope they slow down with the next addition of power creep and start expanding on what we have currently. Especially with how compressed the BR’s are, we will have F22 and Su-57 fighting non Fox 3 fighters lol

F-16C Pobit?

I would really hope not.

And an F-16C block 30 or 40 would be no issue at all, even an F-16E wouldn’t really have much on current 14.0

I think F-16E first