Argue that with Smin, again i can link the artificial differences post if you want to argue with Smin over that. It explains why some vehicles dont get accepted like the SAAF Gripen C not getting AIM 120 even if it can use them.
Also Smin answered that the LAU tests with the US weren’t valid enough iirc, Quartas asked earlier
Absolutely infuriating that they refuse to give the F-18C BOL pods it should have, but then pull moves like giving Japan’s F-15 AIM-120s they only tested a few times…seemingly always the US getting the short end of the stick when it comes to ordnance used in service, trialed or prototyped (like missing LJDAMs, AH-1F’s flare dispenser, F-16C’s inner pylon for dual LGBs and PIDS pylons, F-15 BOL as well etc.)
Its just gaijin with the artificial differences, again same thing when the US got the Late and Finland got a 13.7 hornet at 14.0 well guess it still hasn’t gotten any better for that hornet lol.
Tbf i guessed this would happen but i do have a good guess why only the MLU 2 gets BOL, since its missing AIM 9X, gaijin perhaps wants to send it up in BR when they add the Super hornet, leave the Legacy hornets behind for the US and move to the super and Finland gets the MLU 2 for the next set of top fighters.
Eh given the leaks im leaning towards super but who knows, im just using what info i have. I dont secretly work for the snail, [
but if the snail is watching you should definitely hire me 100% ;) ]
Maybe who knows, i hope they slow down with the next addition of power creep and start expanding on what we have currently. Especially with how compressed the BR’s are, we will have F22 and Su-57 fighting non Fox 3 fighters lol
Is that gonna require gaijin to add the next set of missiles that change the meta? If no then sure, again id rather see the current selection of stuff be worked.
Except that it doesn’t because the IRL BOL modification is not unique to Finnish hornets in the slightest. Like usual Smin doesn’t know what he’s talking about.