Could USA get a SU-27 as an event vehicle?

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
,
1

In 1995, 2 SU27Ps were delivered to the USAF from Belarus, and seeing that other nations have been getting vehicles primarily used in other nations could this be a possible one off event vehicle as I don’t see it fitting in the tech tree.

2 Likes
2

I don’t think so. Neither would i want one in the US tree

3

no, if we go this way then in a year we will have just one big tree of all vehicles instead of seperated trees by nations

4

Unironically would like that tbh

1 Like
5

No

6

no thanks dont want to open this hole

7

In relation to the question, I’d rather the USA get more American jets

9

absolutely not. want to fly sukhois, fly them in russia TT.

3 Likes
10

This would be cool, +1 from me

1 Like
11

China getting Abrams
Everyone gets AH-64E with LDIRCM

Hole is already open

4 Likes
12

I agree with you. The US also had the MiG-25.

14

Why?

Just sounds like you want an Su-27 without grinding either the USSR or china trees

15

Abrams and Apache in China, this is not a hole, this is the entire gates of Oblivion opened.

16

add it, and give ussr abrams and leopard

17

Sure, why not? That way I can put Abrams and Leopards side-by-side with my T90M and T80BVM.

18

yeah, why not. swedish tt could use some planes from hx fighter program too, eurocanards belong together!

19

No nation in War Thunder is getting vehicles used by other nations.
Malaysia uses Su-30s.

20

I’ll have to agree with you, though Malaysian Su-30MKM is a huge jump, from a more in-game focused perspective, Japan need some more competitive high tier close air support vehicle such as, unfortunately I can’t imagine of any proper and not so absurd addition for this case, as Japan is somewhat prohibited to operate these kind of weapons:

The possession of armaments deemed to be offensive weapons designed to be used only for the mass destruction of another country, which would, by definition, exceed the minimum necessary level, is not permissible under any circumstances. For example, the SDF is not allowed to possess intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), long-range strategic bombers, or attack aircraft carriers.

Fundamental Concepts of National Defense, I. Constitution and the Basis of Defense Policy, ch. II Renunciation of War, pt. II The Government’s View on Article 9 of the Constitution, §I Permitted Self-Defense Capability, 2nd-par.

21

Funny how they defend actions like this, but won’t let Britain have the Australian Abrams so Australians can play their stuff together. Predictable, but funny.

22

Play the U.K.