You misunderstand, I am referring only to the addition of new subtrees, not the general additions to a tree, With thailand for example, if they added the Oplot, Stingray, M60 and M163, another 1-2 domestic japanese tanks should’ve been added in the same update under my proposed system, then they go back to normal additions
Korea has got to be the worst choice for a standalone tech tree that they could have gone with, especially after claiming that they don’t want another Israel
1 Like
Ground-wise Korea puts up decent numbers compared to Israel, but in the air department it’s really quite lacking, even with north
42 average vehicles per update across 10 tech trees and 2 game modes, + 6 naval tech trees, and sometimes helicopters.
42 / 27 is an average of 1.55 vehicles per update per game mode per tech tree.
1.55 vehicles in a game that has 8 ranks.
It’ll take some time.
And Gaijin Entertainment is the fastest in the industry, quite literally 2nd to none in adding vehicles.
Patience is required, and we’ll get those vehicles in time.
Last major had 55 vehicles added, which yes I am including the radar trucks as detailed vehicles.
@Alexanderussss @KhorneFlakez1337
Israel has far less vehicles than Unified Korea.
Unified Korea has rank 1 - 8 air and ground, as well as naval.
People are out here begging for countries with less vehicles than South Korea to be tech trees, yet are surprised when a Unified Korea [North Korea has more unique vehicles than South Korea] is announced.
North Korea carries the low end, and South Korea carries the high end.
2 Likes
Israels ground tree wouldn’t be so anemic if Gaijin actually put work into adding Israeli vehicles
1 Like
Poland + WARSAW pact / former soviet bloc nations… nah
Iberia + LATAM… Nah
Korean TT… Yep perfect, nice and politcal with very few options :P
2 Likes
Gaijin is either extremely negligent, or hell bent on spreading Israeli vehicles as thin as possible for longevity
Israel needs a Leopard 2 you say?
2 Likes
It’s the former and their plan to add subnations is proof of that
Honestly its kinda ass with how nerfed its FM are. and the bad thing is there’s practically no plane other than 23 or 29 as russian premium. The most you can do is MiG-21-93 which is prototype for MiG-21 bison or nabbing a romanian vehicle from Italy and make LanceR MiG-21 as russian premium. put it at 12.0 or 12.3 with 4 Magic 2.
I struggle the most from unfair RoF across ships (poor Roma) and accuracy nerfs. Also after the addition of bots in battleships at high tiers BBs gameplay became even worse than it was before.
2 Likes
Korea is one example of a tree we have planned. Not necessarily in the short term or even the “next” one (subject to change of course, plans can change). It was answered today in the context of Japan, Singapore, Indonesia and our general plans for the ASEAN nations.
We have not ruled out other nations or trees. Just they are not the subject for today.
17 Likes
Neither of those are Infantry Fighting Vehicles.
2 Likes
Oh yeah. No BMP in the game at all.
2 Likes
Phew, that’s a relief
Yes I would like the BMP NAMICAs.
The CVRTs could be added to 5 trees a stretch. Which is about the same as the M55
UK: Obviously
FR via BE:
- Scorpion
- Scorpion 90 “Early”
- Striker
- Scimitar
JP via TH:
- Scorpion
- Scorpion (Modernised)
JP via ID:
- Scorpion 90
- Scorpion 90 (LWS)
- Scorpion 90 (Thermals)
JP via MY:
- Scorpion 90 “Early”
- Scorpion 90/20
- Stormer FVT900 IFV
Stretching:
IT via ES:
- Scorpion
IL via CL
- Scorpion
2 Likes
Thats really cool cuz then it’s a tech tree that are consist of both NATO and Chinese/Russian planes and tanks. Can’t say I agree mixing north and south Korea but it’s cool nonetheless.
Yes
The Namica is the only BMP I would accept in the British tree, the other Indian BMPs are only copy paste and would take up space that both Britain and South Africa could fill