all what you say arent available … if you spawn in the wrong vehicle, play it …
Yeah, this video is one of the reason to have this. This is cancer.
So, if you want to J out, reward enemy in any case.
No one J out by mistake.
1 Like
And you couldn’t just make a argument like a normal person to begin with because? I have a serious concerns that this may farther incentivize spawn camping. Why do you think that entitles you to simply accuse me of “abusing game mechanics”, something that could get me banned, rather than actually respond to the issue?
The problem is, if you defend something, it mean that you are using it. In a way or another.
Spawn camping is not a real issue in WT.
If someone is near spawn, it mean that your team failled somewhere.
I rarely see players in spawn / near spawn. Even in naval.
BUT as i said, its a major issue in naval and many complain about it.
1 Like
No it dose not.
Yes it is.
I am aware of the naval issues, we have actually discussed it before and I fully agree with you in regards to the missile boat J-outs.
Solutions can be found to these issues IF we discuss them rather then respond to each other concerns without hurling accusations and no constructive insults.
Your missile boat issue would easily be solve if the “protection” was removed the second they clicked the fire button.
Let change it into another perspective. It is planned variants of F-14D that can fire AIM-120, Harpoon, and HARH, with the original D03 upgrade instead of the Bombcat upgrade. It can join the Missed the Funding Club and put it next to Yak 141 and Mirage 4000.
This should prevent the F-14D buyer to feel sold out as some suggest. The premium one for Gound RB and CAS and the TT one for Air RB.
1 Like
You will soon remove the Ho-Ri from the researchable tech tree in the name of “historical accuracy”. How will you handle the large number of paper vehicles in the naval tech tree then?You’re just going to do nothing and leave them be?
This is not a solution, they will still J out after.
They already do this.
For exemple, USS douglas at 10km is invisible unless it fire missile. after 10 sec, it disapear.
After all missile fired or shells come to them, J out.
repeat and repeat.
The only solution is this. It what i asked since years …
And i’m sorry, but i’m upset that you are against this. So, sorry about how i responded you.
2 Likes
Both the Mirage 4000 and Yak-141 are prototype aircraft, which are given their planned ordinance to be viable in game.
F-14D is a production aircraft.
Vibecoding hard man…
lmao
As we have mentioned a few times in the past, the Navy part of the game has slightly different rules to the other tech branches. Due to the way vessels are constructed, we have decided to include in-game ships that were laid down (i.e. physical construction began), but were not finished.
- We consider as possible the addition of similar ships, those that were laid down, but were not completed in reality.
2 Likes
Soon H39 and Lion
But still thinking about france that got top tier premium without better TT ship.
What it would be ? Alsace ? The only possibility to be better.
1 Like
All right, apology accepted, I fully understand and agree with the issues in naval EC (and there is a point, will this affect naval EC? the changes are not in air EC, but thats also Sim… so that could go either way).
My concerns are just about the spawn camping in ground and not wanting people competing to get into the spawn to vulture kills for no effort, I am not trying to shoot the change down so much as get them to think about potential unforeseen consequences, if they address spawn camping in general, then it would be a non-issue.
I dont think it will change anything about spawn camping.
Often, its at game end and players respawn to try to make some kills and J out before spawn protection end.
About naval EC, that a good question. @Smin1080p_WT, @Stona_WT stona , does it will work in naval EC ?
I don’t think we are standing on opposite sides here, if the reaction gets worse regarding the players who have already brought the packs. It is always an option to make the F-14Ds different enough for players to want to have both.
PS: All the Soviet DDs that was sunk in WWII have ZS-46 VT shell.
1 Like
Alsace was not laid down, by Gaijin’s own rules it is not an option. The Jean Bart has to be seen as the end of the line battleship for the french tec tree.
I know about alsace, was only papership.
So, they added first top tier vehicle at premium better than TT ?
Essentially, yes
but don’t forget: It’s not top tier, bc it isn’t 8.7 so its fair game
I dream of the room in the British tree being used for British service vehicles first and foremost.
I wouldn’t have a problem with the British tree becoming the Commonwealth “tree”, if there weren’t space restrictions in the tech trees.
This is something I’ve mentioned multiple times before on this forum, I have no problem with domestic designs from Commonwealth nations making their way into the British tech tree. However, what usually happens with subtrees is that most of their additions are imported (almost) copy paste vehicles from third parties (be it the US, USSR or Germany).
And accept it or not, chances are that Canada will remain a mostly premium and event vehicle provider, no matter if they become a subtree or not.
1 Like
Leopard 2A4s for everybody
1 Like
AIM-120A didn’t exist yet in 1981, it was a dummy missile with no guidance systems made to test separation
2 Likes