In short: Indonesian leopar2a4 and Greek leopard2a4
2 Likes
Will that apply to other unique premiums locked behind a paywall, in other trees?
Or is it only for the F-14D?
H(c)oping for agm45 on a4e
Nice, kill denying folks cant stop losing. But how about sim?
1 Like
What do I have to pretend about?
I’m as cool as
I don’t think BR11.0 would be a good dividing line. Just as you said, the R60M is an 80s-era missile, and NATO has virtually no comparable aircraft or ammunition for the BR11.0. However, setting the boundary line at BR11.3 would allow a large number of AIM9L to enter this lower-level battle. I think BR10.7-9.7 would be a good choice. AIM9L and R60M have been eliminated from the fighter aircraft.
thats crazy
You dream gaijin prefer making money with us
Canada is event or premium, nothing else for a country who did so much during wars
The M358 APBC-T round, when fired from the M103’s 120mm cannon kinetic-wise irl was extremely powerful.
Compared to in-game, M358 does underperform compared to the real figures when it comes to penetration at 60- and 30-degree sloped armour at similar ranges, near similar distance tests of 1000m and 2000m.
Hunnicut: Firepower: A History of the American Heavy Tank
War Thunder:
I’m still really excited for the model update changes for the T58 and M103 since it will most likely be a hull protection buff against everything that is non-HEATFS or APDS. Considering it has been well over a decade since the hull armour was underperforming by LOS and offered actually barely any better protection compared to the M48 Patton medium tank, which uses a very similar hull design.
2 Likes
Theoretically, all F14D models are compatible with AIM-120. Some content related to AIM120 is included in NAVAIR 01-F14AAD-1. However, it was only used in the test squadron and was not deployed to the fleet.
1 Like
yoo is that HIMARS? I know its just gona be AI vehicle but can we please have playable HIMARS :D
1 Like
Any news on fixing the M3A3? Its missing so much of the spall liner and armor and the round should have more spall but no we love leaving vehicles unfinished dont we.
this is where the modders come in.
yea only modders can make it possible, i saw so many vehicle that are exclusive to AI vehicle and players cant play it, kinda a shame
I am very curious about how people who pre-ordered the F14D feel when they see this thing having less than one version and being stabbed in the back by Gaijin. Gaijin has also become utterly shameless, as they were able to come up with a single version and put the F14D on the tech tree.
gaijin severely underestimated how much people get off to the f14D
Ok, then i have a suggestion! Why don’t you try make AIM-54s and especially 54C+ that was more modern than the other versions a bit more according to data.
It’s the only thing holding it back . And no the in game 54s are very problematic. The altitudes and the speeds the missile performs are like way out of the plane’s envelope. To really hit the manuals’ and references’ stats you need shots at 18km altitude and something like 2,5 mach launch speeds… Those don’t even fit the Tomcat. It should perform maximum at max 15km alt and mach 2 max speed. In game you don’t get the results according to F-14s envelope with the weapon.
And that’s most likely because 54s (and especially 54C and C+) flight envelope isn’t correct.
54C and C+ alone could go faster than A variant and that came from the flight envelope alone.
Well, NF-14Ds in general did a lot of things that the “normal” ones didn’t. For example they tested AGM-84 and AGM-88s among other weapons, and most likely AMRAAMs .
If you go by the book, KH-38MT doesn’t exist and Yak-141 didn’t have weapons anyway.
In any case, in game is the F not the NF, so what the NF did is a whole other story… classified, not much info etc. (results of the tests, modifications in hardware/software etc.) .
But having a proper 54 , i think is a work to be done. You did an attempt , but that is not really according to data. No F-14 could be at 18km alt and 2,5 mach with weapons on , that means you can’t produce even near the recorded results in game.
2 Likes
Why should I feel stabbed in the back? I bought the F-14D because it looked cool (and it still does), not because I wanted it to be and remain unique.
My premium F-14D will remain unchanged, so why would I care if there is an identical version in the TT?
4 Likes
These are confusing times.
1 Like
Lol, so I’d imagine you guys didn’t mean to pre-release some of the major update stuff? x3
We need more of this, great to see. I feel the purpose of premiums overall is to add a “limited” version of a tank, similar to the mobile edition M4 or the M4A3E2 King Cobra. At least some visual changes, at absolute most some vismod stuff or fun additions like on the M1 KVT or Clickbait. Perfect premiums in my eyes.
RAHHHHH ANOTHER LEOPARD 2A4!!!11!1!!
2 Likes