Community Update No.10: Starting The Year Off!

It’s already in game, all we need is Yugoslavia now

1 Like

Question about this.

Ive never seen what the UI looks like with 11 slots, Does it actually fit into the UI or does the 11th get cut off the UI like the nuke plane does when you have 10 vehicles in a lineup?

If it does get cut off is gaijin ever going to make it fit into one screen?

Dont give me hope rulan…

When AAM4-B will come?

Not this update, sadly.

Oh no, American bias. All they ever do is buff the US. Slavic brothers, let’s start whining early so the AIM-120D drops with the update as complete garbage right away.

No pls :(

Average DCS player

the only thing i want besides F-22 was ASRAAM ;-;

1 Like

To be fair, it HAS been in use with F22 squadrons. But why not seeing how the BMPT is the 2016 upgrade plan to Relict instead of the original Kontact-5 as it fights tanks and ammunition from the 1980s. Or how we have the T90A fighting the M1 105mm that was retired a whole DECADE before the T90A entered service and it doesn’t even get the ammo it had IRL. The selective equipment and balancing is crazy.

Any info about the “real” max range? Basic sources say 200km, but that seems too low, even before that figure of 100km in 90s. Even D-3 can kinda sneak into these ranges

Please use only english here, Otherwise go to;

National Communities - War Thunder — official forum



For the US maybe???

1 Like

AIM120D with 185km of range will be interesting…

where i dont see it anywhere
and how ?

Lockheed Martin - F-16C PoBIT: Viper gets new fangs new jet for the US hopefully

You look at the 120B and 120C under preforming and think the 120D won’t?

1 Like

How is GNSS gonna help?
GNSS only provides the data of X,Y coordinates but not the Z-axis information

Most sources say “…exceeding 200 km” although the “real” max range is probably around ~250 km. The “fuelled” or still-powered max range we can estimate to be ~200 km and the rest is kinematic (~50 km), which lines up.

In WT terms 50 km shots may be more viable than with the current C-5, so… fun times :D

If I had to guess, putting coordinates in the sky (which the current implementation of GNSS is capable of currently) means the missile should fly most of the time in thin air + IOG+DL having near-zero “drift” which should translate into the missile losing a bit less energy during flight. At least, that’s what I think it is. Oh, and there’s also the possibility of being able to launch and go cold since the missile “knows where it is” and “where it should be” (just about, anyways) a bit better.

1 Like