5 Likes
For the American light line to be complete, all that’s missing is the T49, which is basically an M41 with 90mm armament.
https://old-forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/332041-t49-m41-walker-bulldog-90mm-gun-from-m48/
Suggestion I made in 2016
2 Likes
Honestly, I wouldn’t be opposed as long as it’s the prototype and not just a copy and paste of the dedicated Hungarian version or one of the other countries’ variants. KF31 would be cool too, that said.
2 Likes
I’m pretty sure there are more light vehicles that could be added
1 Like
What weapon does the KF31 carry?
Lynx 120 would also be pretty cool and actually something that the German tree doesn’t have yet, a light tank with a 120mm gun
If I remember correctly, it’s a Lance turret with a 30mm or 35mm gun and a 7.62, but no ATGMs
Aye, ditto with the Lynx SkyRanger 30 from the SPAA line
1 Like
To be intellectually honest, the Stingray is an American vehicle, and it’s right that it be added to the American tech tree in some way. The KF41 is a German vehicle, and it’s right that it be added to the German tech tree in some way. The G-91 R/3 is an Italian aircraft, and it’s right that it be added to the Italian tech tree in some way. Vehicles that have only been tested by several nations but were designed in others have no reason to be added, because it would be an endless process.
2 Likes
So what the type 59 Jaguar which was a joint project between the US and China but adopted by neither be in both trees
That would be a KPz-70/MBT-70 situation
1 Like
When the Jaguar is added it will go into both tackle trees, as it should.
1 Like
That’s actually doable. If I remember correctly, the US had its own version of the prototype, and China had its own version as well. The US version featured several mods not found on the Chinese version, and vice versa. So there’s a way to do without full-on C&P it into both trees
1 Like
You can find the US one on Google maps at a Textron (formerly Cadillac gage) facility
Aye! Along with the original Type 59 exported to the US for Textron/CG to study
1 Like
None of these inbound vehicles or the rumored T-84 will fill this extremely large ground BR gap, that’s my problem.
1 Like
A BR gap is something that exists for a lineup. Your post’s attempt to redfine BR gaps is noted.
If there is no vehicle there, there is no gap to begin with.
USA had a BR gap for SPAA because there were BRs of lineups without SPAA.
France had a BR gap when Leopard 2A4 was released, and now 2 more MBTs filled the lineup.
Currently Japan has no BR gap because it has no singular tanks or SPAA on their own.
Adding a singular 10.0 - 11.0 vehicle would cause a BR gap to exist though.
You can try to redefine it all you want, but a gap is a gap, whether a single vehicle is there or none at all. There are no ground vehicles between 9.7 and 11.7, that is easily defined as a gap. A lack of lineups is another matter entirely really, but I get wanting multiple to be added at once that can pair together.
About time we got this thing added into the game.
I’m not here to agree or disagree, but… you want the KF41? I can pretty comfortably tell you that the PUMA is better in every way.
Sure ill take it
Why did we get this before the LAV-25?
2 Likes