Sekrit Dokuments found
To land at 6.3 B.R
1 Like
it was an april fools bait that morons (lazerpig) and tabloids took
11 Likes
So have most Objects but when did that stop Gaijin.
the difference here is that the playerbase has matured beyond their knowledge only being from world of tanks. such things arent unnoticed for years anymore. if a thing doesnt have any public photographs or documents it doesnt get suggested and gaijin would be ripped a new one for its addition
2 Likes
Every single “Object” vehicle in the game was actually produced and tested, hell most of them still exist today and you can go see them in museums in Russia
5 Likes
there are some questionable liberties made with those vehicles though. I wont ever believe the 2s38 was a kill literally everything perfectly vehicle considering the era it was made in and that the total built can be counted by Captain Hook’s fingers.
even some production vehicles such as the BMP family have some significant unrealistic behaviours which make it far far more capable than it really is
And there are things NATO IFVs are unrealistically good at in WT. Such as loading ATGMs without risk of losing crew. In real life one of the biggest advantages of the BMP-3 is the internal loading mechanism of the 2A70.
Throwback to when he got BTFO’d by RedEffect and then cried about it.
7 Likes
doom turtle at home:
1 Like
Did said morons bite? I assume they did )))))
1 Like
Bradley, warrior and CV90 are all doing quite poorly in WT and atgm loading without threatening crew is universal even for soviets.
imagine being such a trash tier youtuber that another slop tier youtuber can slam dunk on you easily
3 Likes
I quite like the Warrior, but I think that’s mostly due to the RARDEN being so good. And for the Bradley and CV90 it depends on the variants. The 9040B and BILL are very good but the 9040C is straight up useless. The M3 is good but the M3A3 is kinda bad because ATGMs aren’t meta and top attack ATGMs have issues with modeling
damn thats a new one. LOL
1 Like
the rarden on such a slow platform doesnt shine for me. the milan 2 missiles certainly do though
Not true
As implemented in game ,each object has something added to them that was never part of those vehicles when they were tested or before they were declared failures.
This is true for most of the soviet stuff.
Ammunition that didn’t exist until 10/20 years later
Different engines
Armor additions
sights/NV
and so on
They will claim this was for balancing reasons but each change improved Soviet vehicles/planes and so on and somehow (surprise) nerfed effectiveness of other countries.
Can you give any evidence of this? It’s a fact that they all existed, and were tested in some amount.