Combined Arms Enduring Confrontation

This game mode would cut down on the wait time’s for all sim match types and also ships ai controlled AA should be nerfed in range to about 2 kilometers and it’s accuracy should be lesser than realistic modes to encourage shooting them yourself instead of depending on ai and also in true sim fashion all ships are locked into the bridge camera view lol

This mode would allow for submarines to be added

Yes please i want this

yes … YES … YES. I want this.

I think it would be great if ground vehicles could refuel at friendly military bases or FOBs instead of in the middle of contested objectives, as they currently do in ground game modes. Capture points could be fortified positions with supply depots instead of simple 30-meter-wide circles in the middle of nowhere. This would make them feel much more meaningful and immersive.

Looks like Nuclear Thunder will be our CAEC

imagen

1 Like

the news are GREAT but CAEC is also better because its for tanks too

If they are planning to implement player controlled SPAA, I bet they will also make it for tanks, probably

yea i said it too, i hope players can replace some bots so it will be more realistic

My poor IJN Yamato spawning in late to the match eating a nuke visualized

avkevh

I hope this also means we get to see early cold war stuff where its 1950s → 1960s with atomic air to air missiles and other atomic weapons. Gaijin should be very liberal on what gets nukes as there are a lot of aircraft that could have them in the early cold war as the logic was if it could fly it could drop them. User outcome may very.

Are there plans to add short-length and narrow-width unpaved Feldflugplatz (Advance Airfield ?) suitable for Rank 1 - 4 Plane?

無題177_20260701091751
klausheide_g01

images (19)

Certainly could, and some maps have runways baked in that can easily be set as capturable frontline strips. Honestly I would say setting airfields is the easy part of all this.

2 Likes

I doubt that a third of those will be done in the next two years, especially since they state in that list that there’s no guarantee of all of those being added. Though I would like to be pleasantly surprised.

Unless Proximity Voice chat, translator, and more ways to properly coordinate with the rest of the team are available. It wouldn’t do well.

Let’s not forget that something comparable occurred twice, and both were flops. ->World War mode.

I haven’t played World War mode before, so I don’t know much about it in detail.

However, based on the overview I looked up, this suggested game mode seems superior in terms of freedom and lower barriers to entry.

Isn’t it still too early to assume it will fail just like World War mode.

No, it’s really not.
Nuclear Escalation was really good when it was released for an Event. However, when it “Returned,” very few bothered to play it because it was stripped down from what it had originally been.

World War Mode, however, by default, and I played both; no one had a clue what they were doing. Cause the whole GUI way it was set up wasn’t ergonomic or straightforward.

Unfortunately, this would be no different. Gaijin has an issue just leaving the gamemode the way it is alone and constantly making attempts to “Fix” or improve it, without realizing that it causes more harm.

I think you’re conflating correlation with causation on Nuclear Escalation here. The current iteration has some serious issues regarding ai units excessive performance when you play, plus a high BR aircraft requirement to play.

World War mode as Gaijin designed it definitely was not explained, discussed, or really even after-season reviewed to deal with the sources of player frustration as it should have been. Something that clear, straightforward communication on from the Gaijin’s side would have at least alleviated to some extent. But that’s something of an overarching issue on a lot of things, which is also hampered by a language barrier for most of the dev crew from my understanding.

Hell if asked to act as a limited restriction intermediary or assistant dev in regards to this suggestion I would be all for it. Because it would mean to me that the devs want to make something well-received, well functioning, and attractive to more players than their current offerings.

1 Like

Is a stripped-down version of the original shown in the event. I get the points you are saying but the reality is they should have built on and corrected things from what was shown in the event.

No disagreement here on that.

But do you have any input or additional suggestions for this thread topic?

Adjust the naval spawning area.

Lol Gaijin looked at what you where making and went Write that Down! But they do read the the forms so even stuff that do not get passed to the devs does get read by them just because they use the form. What they do with pass to the devs is beyond me likely end up in a monthly team PowerPoint.