Due to explosive radius limit and offset code, CM502KG behaves very bad in dev server.(After plenty try and reproduce) Even worse than AKD-9 who has a light-level warhead.
After comparing with 125mm HEAT-FS, we found that CM502KG quotes the same explosive code, which can explain why its performance so bad.
does pakistan air force know their heli take a missile cant even overcome the main armor of the leopard a4? I wonder what does Mr Barannikov feel when he tested CM502 kg but only receive a hit and exit just like “i dont wanna to see this piece again”,that is really funny.
With the current state of the dev server, it is possible that attacking the same MBT with all 8 CM502s without destroying it. Isn‘t that ridiculous for a missile with 11kg warhead?
lets not act like china is this abnormally weak nation, besides the fact its miss a 14.0 it has incredibly strong 13.7 AIR, and for ground they were the first to receive IR + Radar datalink
Wz1001 good mobility and good turret armor but shit reload, ammo and joke hull armor and no have a spall liner and this opinion true with the ztz99a meanwhile the vt4 just a simple trash
Spaa complete shit
J11b not good but not terrible but the rafale, f15e, f2, f18, f16, ef2k better than j11b
Z10 okey imo but awful shit agm speed (345m/s) so the ah64, mi28, ka52, tigers better than z10
And now china get one useless shit new cm502kg what have extreme overnerf… gj gaijin
If its a copy paste of an already existing code it’ll probably be patched before live. Like the AAM-4 shared a lot of MICA code for a while on dev and it was super goofy because of it.
Z-10ME RWR just got nerfed, it can no longer detect E-M band but instead E-J band (It can no longer detect locks from K band tracking radars like Pantsir)
This makes their heli RWR officially worse than the AH-1F RWR (it can detect D-J band), which is a heli from the 1970s LOL