Different Devs do different things, this is a backend thing, its not the same as adding a new vehicle or fixing bug. Whole research system was coded a long time ago so probably to make it work they have to figure out the old code and find a way to implement this feature without breaking the game. The person who wrote the original code for vehicle research probably doesn’t even work in the company anymore so the poor devs have to decode what he has written.
1 Like
Awesome job guys. Having issues when it comes to development of new stuff and adding brand new mechanics such as fox 3s is completely normal. Hope y’all won’t listen to the braindead insults and comments that i’ve seen down here, keep it up!
1 Like
seems like it, im really excited to see these more detailed models get expanded out to everything in game eventually - more dynamic stuff is always great
Or just allow to earn progress for an event in any mode.
Also just dont do this two day task stupidity and just give one task with the total amount of points that runs for the whole duration. On top they still can do tasks for reaching certain milestones with those smaller rewards.
But they never have been good when it came to make the game better for players.
Events arent even that hard, even for the 45k mission points i got those within a day, and I work full time and maintain a relationship
1 Like
I hope all autoloaded tanks get this nerf. There is nothing more frustrating than shooting straight through an autoloader and dealing no damage or penalty.
You would be right if it wasn’t a year since they put it in the roadmap, and half a year late (from when it was originally planned). I don’t care how much technical dept they have, adding a booster doesn’t take 6 months. The system is likely already done, they are just crunching numbers to tweak parameters now.
quite excited for this too, I quite like exploring the internals of different vehicles
1 Like
This article is a win for us and i think for CM team also. Congratulations for this victory CM!
3 Likes
100%
Seriously tho, the research bonus was meant to come last summer… Its been delayed so many times now
1 Like
lol? aim at their right side of the turret and they go boom??
I assume that F/A-18A (1986 or 1990) between F-14A Early and F-14B Tomcat
F/A-18A Hornet located between F-14A Early & F-14B Tomcat. after A-7 Corsair II might be new attack aircraft 11.7 ~ 12.0 from USAF & USMC at rank VIII.
After F-16C Block 50 maybe F-16V (F-16C Block 70/72 standard) but in the future gaijin could add 2 or 3 F-16C at BR 12.3 ~ 12.7 before F-16C Block 50
1 Like
I like the transparency, especially with the hype for dev blog season, this is a nice thing due to them being posted later than usual
While they’re at it, they should roll back the recent increases in “upgrade for coupon” score requirements.
Demanding 500 000 score in only 12 days (for a rank III reward) is ludicrous. That is 41 666 score every single day. You can forget playing other games during this time, or even other game modes…
they could add block 52 with aim9x and aim120c in the future
i dont think its that bad, makes sense for it to be lower for lower tier awards but I dont play all day every day and i can get a 100k points in a day if i really try, and thats with me having a life
1 Like
Across all gamemodes?
Because the poll wasn’t gamemode specific, which actually makes it kinda useless.
Why do you even do polls that way?
Ask such kind of questions for each gamemode next time.
I doubt sim needs more magical ridiculous stuff like this…
The arcade ground playerbase is the largest playerbase in WT. It is almost 3 times the size of the RB playerbase. If you do polls the way you do at the moment, all answers will be dominated by arcade players. So you will end up with mechanics that are great for AB being implemented in RB and SB as well.
So i repeat my question:
Why do you do polls this way?
It just doesn’t work.
Huh? Why? Block 50 can use those as well, no need for 52. More likely 52 would be a premium or event at some point.
If you could fix HESH damage and remove the shatter feature from APDS/APCR. The former is just extrodinarily unreliable and like 1/3 shots are awful even with MASSIVE HESH rounds.
The latter has some bearing in truth but is massively overdone in game. Things like 6pr APDS shattering when passing thru Tigers suspension has some realism to it. BUT NOT 17PR.
1 Like