This is missing the TNT equivalent for other explosives. (Edit: It isn’t, but the explosive weight and TNT equivalent are in different places for some reason). As well as being unnecessarily large…
This is an improvement from before, but still much worse than old player profiles. On the current player profile, we only have the option to display one aspect of the player achievements. You are now adding “Vehicle Collector”, “Ace of Spades”, and “Medalist”. But a player can only choose one at a time! Not to mention, in the player view, there is a ton of wasted space:
Onto the other things: are you planning anything that will make the game better? Like better maps, new game modes…?
Or are you just focusing on player profile page for clan recruiters, players who want to find cheaters and narcissists who like to compare their private parts?
@Oxygen_Thief_WT Oxy! You are the man! Thanks again for getting these back and keeping also the achievable requirements in place to have something that doesn’t stress someone out.
Also, great work getting the extra info/background added to the decals. Fascinating to read about them a bit and also know where to approximately place them without having to try and find photos.
Also FINALLY seeing some progress on that RP bug fix!!!
f18 would be very fun. its never going to compete with f15e unless they add the latest super hornet. stop being dumb just to hate on Us mains, its just some extra flavour
mh-60 doesnt have it, ah-1 doesnt have it, eurocopter tiger doesnt have it, mi-28 doesnt have it, rooivalk doesnt have it, z-10 doesnt have it, z-19 doesnt have it, ah-129 doesnt have it. and many others dont have it. just apaches and the ka-52 have electronic blocks
Could it be feasible for the UAV feed to be displayed in another monitor? I feel like having the UAV view on the corner takes up a lot of real state, but even then I look forward to it. And munition interception rewards are awesome, a long waited feature for sure!
With the works on stat cards and UI, it would be nice to see changes to vehicle stat cards.
Players have lamented for a while now that aircraft statcards are misleading at best and woefully inaccurate at worst.
The Swift F.7 is more than 100 km/h faster than the statcard suggests!
It would be nice if the statcard showed statistics with your currently selected fuel load, and defaulted to being shown with minfuel (or 50%, or something).
Its good you all finally acknowledged that the RP going missing is a bug and not being overshadowed by mods claiming it was a feature. But its a multi year bug finally being recognized? Seriously Gaijin? That mean you are finally gonna fix the XM-1 after you stripped its shell performance then removed it from the game entirely?
OH MAN that would be awesome! If we could use an IP address thing like you can with the mini map 😄 And I actually have my second monitor sideways (vertical) so could have the mini map AND UAV up at the same time.
Has a very limited CAS load due to the need to buddy lase most munitions (exception to this being Walleyes)
Would probably sit perfectly at 12.7 or 12.3 depending on how the FM performs
I’m guessing this will be skipped in favor of the F/A-18C for now, and the A can fit as literally any of: TT vehicle, Premium vehicle, or Squadron vehicle
F/A-18A+
Two major ways the A+ can be represented in WT
The first way is as a worse F/A-18C - receiving 9Ms, 120As, and having worse engines
The second way is as a better F/A-18A - receiving 9Ms, 7M/Ps, having more AtA pylons, and having better CAS loads
The first way (worse C) would probably be 13.3 or 13.7 and would make a good Squadron Vehicle like the JF-17.
The second way (better A) would probably be 13.0 and would fit well in the TT or as a premium vehicle.
F/A-18C
More than likely receiving 9Ms, 120As, and much better AtG weaponry
Iconic 10x AIM-120 loadout
Possible additions of the AGM-88 HARM and AGM-84E SLAM
Will more than likely sit at 13.7 in the TT
F/A-18E/F Super Hornets
In my opinion it’s too early to tell when the Super Hornet(s) will come to the game. The F/A-18E/F are not too good to come to the game (they’d be worse than the EF and Rafale), but the A/A+/C all fill niches where the E/F would not be required. The Super Hornet(s) will more than likely simply be the first AESA radar platform for the USA, likely bringing AIM-120C-5s and AIM-9Xs with it. We should not expect the Super Hornet(s) very soon because they can be represented better at a later date.
EA-18G Growler
See above. Maybe the Growler will come with the advent of ECM being added to WT, but until that happens I wouldn’t expect it.
Who will receive what?
USA (guaranteed) - Pretty much all of them aside from maybe some Canadian/Australian Hornets, but we’ll have to see what Gaijin wants to do with those.
Germany/Switzerland (possible) - gszabbi99’s leak list has predicted the Swiss F/A-18C for a long time, so we may end up seeing it at some point. Since Germany got the EF there’s not a huge demand for it anymore, but it’s still possible.
Britain/Canada/Australia (possible) - Another possible entry but not guaranteed for sure. While it would be cool to see the Canadian CF-188 or the Australian F/A-18A/F, we will have to wait and see how Gaijin feels about adding them.
Sweden/Finland (guaranteed) - We know for a fact that the Finnish line in the Swedish TT has a slot missing after the MiG-21bis. That’s 100% for the F-18C. Whether Gaijin decides to add the F-18C without AtG ordinance or the F/A-18C with AtG ordinance is up for debate/discussion.
Italy/Spain (unlikely for now) - While Spain did operate the F/A-18A+, I doubt we will see it come to Italy for a long time. I would either expect it to come as a Squadron Vehicle or in the TT as a subtree, but that is by no means confirmed for now. Do not expect this at all for the time being.
Will this functionality be added to the in-vehicle minimap (not the respawn screen)? Currently, for ground vehicles, if you want to switch between the ground map and air map, or to change the map center, you have to go into the respawn screen and change it from there.
