@Smin1080p_WT any news on the RP bonus?
Yeah, more unique vehicles to the TT and the C&P stuff as premiums (because of familiarity).
Because it represents Canada with the Canadian flag.
Well good news is the UK one is getting the correct name.
but the M4A5 was the name the US was going to call if it entered service with them. In-game the Ram II in the US tree has the Canadian Flag which have led people to believe that Canada called it the M4A5 so unless you are planning on making the operator nations American it should have the operator name of the thing and not the name of a variant that only existed on paper.
Heck when the US tested the Ram during the, they called it “Canadian Medium Tank M3” according to the archive footage that has been given to me. War Dept Film Bulletin 6: Canadian Medium Tank M-3, Etc., 1941 : United States. War Department : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
I’m not talking about C&P or unique I want to see how they would change the implementation of it
Implentation of what exactly lol… what does rework for you mean
Very useless… i voted no in fact…
Thanks for giving the heads up abt this, looking forward to it !
The player-detailed static prop aircraft and ships recently added to the Pearl Harbor and Stalingrad testflight locations significantly improved the appearance and feel of the dioramas, I’m excited to see what the other upcoming changes will do for the practical uses of Test Flight !
Thanks for the sneak peaks! always nice to see what’s being worked on in a full blog post.
For SHAR 2, its missing 540lb bombs was just fixed.
The Pitot tube on the Sea Harrier FRS.1 was corrected recently and should be present in a future update.
Beyond this, we have only a couple of reports remaining for SHAR 1 spesifically:
-
Incorrect HUD
-
Should have ARI 18228/19 RWR (for the late SHAR 1)
-
Missing Radar Gunsight
For SHAR 2, again the majority of reports have already been fixed. The remaining open reports are:
-
Missing NVG
-
Missing Twin Stores Carrier (Possibly requires further study)
-
HUD / MFD
-
ARI 18228/19 should be able to identify radars
And a further suggestion which is not a full bug / historical issue, but a theoretical possibility that needs a bit more review. No photos sadly exist of this configuration, which makes it harder:
- Ability to use BOL with Twin Sidewinders
Cool things for sure, good job!
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any information whether the armour for the Namer is going to be updated? You mentioned the devs are reading the reports, there are quite a few on the Namer and it would be a needed change, especially after the increase in weight.
Stay tuned to the news. Very soon there will be news.
Naturally we are always planning new vehicles to fill gaps for other nations, but America has had a huge SPAA gap for longer than most nations and a lot of people were keen to hear an update on this.
Thats sad to hear…
Great blog, but, are there any news regarding BR changes?
And how is that useless? it gives the sub-tree the room they need to have unique stuff TT(or have tech breaches they can’t due to the 5-line rule) and allows host trees to get back the room they lost to the sub-tree.
On top of that allows for more than one sub-tree without locking one to nothing but premium and events. it’s just all-around better than current sub-trees.
Gaijin “soon” usually means a few months +.
No… it means a few years.
Just like they promised us Japanese props like the Ki-48, Ki-66 and the A6M8 zero. Which after years havent made it to the TT.