I mean, its a bit like complaining your unbuilt house looks bad because it doesn’t have a roof.
2 Likes
There’s pros and cons to both for sure. My opinion is that these modifications of existing vehicles should be in the tech tree and unique or niche versions should be event exclusives. Most of the recent event vehicles tend to seem lazy to add, even if it wasn’t intended. Lookong forward to what that next vehicle is though.
Overall sounds promising, but are there plans to expand DM changes to aircraft? I see this as a good footstool to improve DM fidelity across the board, if possible.
I, for one, like knowing about some of technical aspects of your work. Especially since the instance of Squadron RP being affected by internal changes. It’s interesting, as well as transparent about what causes these issues. I would like to see more small breakdowns like these.
Honestly, mistakes happen. A correction to text or clarification is always welcome. If this is in regards to the comment about Spikes being random, it happened to touch on a topic that had high visibility in regards to bugs and performance issues. Being joked about sounded insulting, otherwise having a personalized blog is not a bad thing in itself.
Battletanx announcer: Nuke deployed.
You mean I don’t need to manually track my nukes anymore?? =DDDDDDD
1 Like
When the idea of a bonus was first mentioned I made the assumption that it was along the lines of a flat discount for the whole tree
I.e. if I had reached the end of the ground TT in a nation there would be a flat 5-10% discount for other nation’s ground vehicles.
Now I am seeing people say it will be an RP buff for the first 3 matches of the day.
Even a 35% buff for 3 matches only amounts to roughly 1 match of RP. I can only blame myself for my high hopes of a significant bonus.
Needless to say it’s a pretty big let down to wait all this time for what I consider to be a bonus so small that’s it’s addition will be inconsequential.
6 Likes
Maybe I did not use the best words, but the point is that it is better to say what is wrong at the construction stage, like the walls are crooked, although the roof has not been installed yet. But that’s not a complaint.
1 Like
the old style of events are no longer a thing, just the single vehicle grind ones and the occasional cosmetic reward like the Mad Max one
Good stuff, I’m looking forward to see future improvements and additions to profile customization.
1 Like
Oxy, I’m trying to submit a bug report since the s&d update was released. I am on Xbox and can’t submit my report as I can’t find which “client” I am running on Xbox. Is this an existing issue or am I being blind and not seeing it?
Basically SAM launch noises are now missing from ZSU-23-4m4
RP Bonuses for New Nations (…) I’m very aware that to some this may come across like we’re just riding this feature out until it’s forgotten, but we are (hopefully!) several weeks away from it being ready.
The only relevant information I see, underneath all these explanations, is that you will need another several week delay for a feature you promised to implement by November last year.
Absolutely diabolical grip lol
2 Likes
[Overhaul of Gaijin calculator - #153 by KillaKiwi]
When will we see the remake of the penetration depth calculator（
1 Like
Is the nuke counter retroactive?
1 Like
Its a bad idea for whoever tries to do stock works. If some popular vehicles such as the object 292 can be redeemed again, no matter if its tradable or not, the obj292 will see a price tank because the demand has suddenly drop.
Kind of ignoring the issues that cropped up aren’t you?
The customization, while not really too crazy is a pretty nice addition.
Leave him alone! At least he can write!
PS. But I agree, such a pen grip is a bit disturbing. But I have seen worse.
3 Likes
@Stona_WT when the RP bonus goes live for the 7 day test will there be a thread made by you guys to collect feedback?
I find the proposed bonus underwhelming
1 Like
Technical difficulties are an understandable reason to delay - once or twice. We are talking about, I think, the fifth delay, as I said, original roadmap intended this feature in November, that’s almost 9 months ago. I do not deny that programming is hard, but this feature is clearly, not at all, their priority, so they are still playing for time.
1 Like
Should I even read further? How throwing two different planes which were at different BRs before, to same BR now is “decompression”?
Great, so I can just stop hoping for events to have actually unique vehicles save for like 1-2 events in the whole year?
It’s already 1/3 of the clones. And is also incorrectly named on top of it.
Oh hey, it’ll be only select few in the major patch, and then it’ll be forgotten. Just like spall liners, just like more useless modules for tanks(30 seconds of repair of autoloader only when stationary vs. 8 of loader replacement while on the move, and still able to fire and reload btw).
2 Likes
Maybe that is the goal. Make it so worthless that people complain and then they roll the “bonus” back. Gaijin has no interest in providing any sort of bonus that decreases the grind in any way. As I said elsewhere:
They’re having a meeting to discuss the planning of the meeting to discuss the implementation of the plan talked about in the previous meeting which will require more meetings. This was supposed to have been released in November 2023. They don’t want to implement this because it could potentially decrease the grind. They don’t want happy players they want frustrated players that spend money to bypass the grind.
4 Likes
Ai gen¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1 Like