It’s not at all, they are 2 completely different chassis. The only JGSDF project that uses a similar chassis to the CCV is the NBC Recon which uses one of the cabin type designs instead of the CCV hatch type.
No they don’t at all. The CCV has like 7 different chassis designs depending on if
You are using the wiki vs the actual documents that you posted yourself, but clearly haven’t read.
They are in the documents YOU used as a source!
I have tried to and as u may not know, i cant read Japanese but u seem to be able to. Maybe u are Japanese or know Japanese! So me who dont get Japanese tried to figure out the measurmeants but could not tell for witch version of it the mesurmeants were, so i went to wiki for information there!
And if u soo versed in Japanese instead of giving me images of a language i don’t understand why not just write down the correct mesurmeants from the start and i will go in and correct it! So when read and respond to this chat what i want to see from u are the written mesurmeants thank you!
I did
should be added eventually. would be great as the top tier IFV option even though it doesn’t have ATGMs.
I hope so too! And u can think of it as the Japanese version of 2S38 but bigger and stronger! It has capability to fight ground targets but also air targets with it’s proxy rounds!
So what Br would this fit well in?
I mean its basically equivalent or slightly better to a German PUMA or Soviet 2S38… so guessing 10.0 too.
+1 for me
It should be better than both of those. It’s APFSDS shell is even longer than the CTAS40 which can pen 175mm point blank. Just compare the pen and ROF to similar vehicles.
CCV ~180mm @ 750rpm
CV90C 170mm @ 300rpm
Ajax/Jaguar 175mm @ 200rpm
Puma 121mm @ 200rpm
2S38 225mm @ 120rpm
Nothing really compares to it’s gun and it will essentially act like a release Type 87 machine gunning anything down.
It would be nice to see the 313rpm 50mm version too as a fitted for, but not with type of deal like the Yak141.
Suggestion passed to the developers for consideration.
