+1 Japan top tier is in dire need of more (non-C&P) Vehicles
old Suggestion for more info and Sources;
3 Likes
Been waiting for the CCV for a long time +1
5 Likes
A lot of things wrong with this. For starters the dimensions don’t match anything that is known on any of the proposed chassis. The CCV is likely the B-4b as the B-6b’s main focus was additional armor protection. This would give a 2.75m width, a 7.47m length and a 1.97m height of only the chassis. The designed mass is 22t. The engine is unknown, but likely shared with the NBC Recon which doesn’t have any specs listed for it’s HP.
The gun isn’t a CTAS40 because that is the name of the CTA Int. gun used on the Jaguar. The gun is Japanese and has a 750rpm RoF.
5 Likes
Your right, and thank you for linking the old suggestion was looking all over for it but did not find it! Cheers :D
And i’m here to deliver to u in a silver platter XD
1 Like
May i direct u to see this old suggestion of the vehicle:
Pen seems a bit low to no?
Its bigger then the CTA round yet that has around the same pen as the Strf9040c in game
1 Like
+1 to the suggestion but as already mentioned this topic has a few errors in the OP, which would be good to resolve. Data such as the gun being wrong and consequently the rate of fire, and in the same vein penetration values are not reliable.
It would be recommended to defer to the original thread made on the old forum. If you believe information there is in error it would be best to find reliable citations to indicate why you believe that data is unreliable as well as why you believe that the new claimed data is more valid.
3 Likes
Sorry for the typo i did, I meant to write 40mm CTA gun and not the other! I did some editing to the post and linked a Wikipedia article for the vehicle and the old suggestion to the Sources!
1 Like
Apperantly from what i read (Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/v7kqaj/close_combat_vehicle_a_good_spaag_for_japan/), and u probably right, but the round is telescoped and the muzzle velocity is below 2km/s so the pen drops at longer ranges. But the japanese round is 40x365mm so the pen should be higher but currentlly the facts about this round are not all clear, but u are right the pen on this gun is higher then that of the CV9040!
Could you use Gaijins Pen calculator which I don’t know how to use …=D
u cant calculate pen for APFSDS rounds in the Gaijins Pen calculator, i tried!
I don’t know what you are referencing, but I’m the one who originally posted the google drive link that you linked in the OP and the images I sent are from that drive. There isn’t a single config that has that LxWxH dimension that matches any chassis. B-4b is the most likely chassis used as it’s referenced the most in the later docs.
Oh, i was looking at the old version of it XD, well i tried using the one u linked and from the calculations it seems that it can pen up to 437 mm of composite at a slope of 60 degress! But at witch range is still unclear!
I have based the chassi mesurmeants to the Komatsu new 8x8 APC witch is a chassi based on the CCV chassi, they both have close to the same messurmeants. Info of this can be found on Wiki and the articles about this vehicle. Reason i used this messurmeants was becouse i could not find the original CCV messurmeants!
Link to one of the articles: Japan Unveils Armored Vehicle Prototype for 'Counter Island Invasion'
Yes, dream vehicles for Japanese TT.
that uh doesnt seem right… thats on the level of DM33 from 105
I found that result wierd too witch i don’t get why it gave me that result!
It’s not at all, they are 2 completely different chassis. The only JGSDF project that uses a similar chassis to the CCV is the NBC Recon which uses one of the cabin type designs instead of the CCV hatch type.
No they don’t at all. The CCV has like 7 different chassis designs depending on if
You are using the wiki vs the actual documents that you posted yourself, but clearly haven’t read.
They are in the documents YOU used as a source!
1 Like