Adding anti-collapse lining is not a very labor-intensive project.An intern with no experience can quickly complete it after just a few hours of learning.In light of recent events,it is hard not to suspect that this was done on purpose.Moreover,the armor of China’s top-tier tanks has been weakened without reason.Some areas that should clearly provide good defense simply fail to do so.All error reports with clear evidence have been denied.
Now,for a much-anticipated segment,please provide evidence to prove that the armor of China’s top-tier tanks is indeed so weak.
The issue regarding the addition of anti-spall liners for Chinese ground vehicles was approved almost a year ago. Similarly, there was an issue about the JH-7A being able to carry four KH-29 missiles, which has since been quietly changed to “not enough info” I’m deeply concerned about Gaijin’s stance on the former issue.
With the vt5 's ridiculous inner structure and laughable protection, i cant make an assertion that no one really cares about chinese viechles and no one treat chinese viechles seriously.
In fact, Gaijin has already added spall liners to Leopard 2A7, Strv 122, Challenger, T-90M, and other top vehicles 2 years ago at this point. Accordingly, most spall liner bug report issues were posted in the same time, two years ago… The ones that haven’t been marked “not a bug” are then “submitted as suggestion” and then forgotten about. This long wait significantly shows Gaijin’s negligence.