Support, the survivability of China’s mbt after the breakdown is still the worst batch of top rooms
1 Like
For a whole year, Gaijin had forgotten about it.
1 Like
no your feelings dont matter
1 Like
The issue regarding the addition of anti-spall liners for Chinese ground vehicles was approved almost a year ago. Similarly, there was an issue about the JH-7A being able to carry four KH-29 missiles, which has since been quietly changed to “not enough info” I’m deeply concerned about Gaijin’s stance on the former issue.
2 Likes
There’s no doubt that chinese tanks were treated in special way. The issue was accepted one years ago and the bug was still not fixed.
2 Likes
请尽快解决这个问题，已经脱了很长时间了
With the vt5 's ridiculous inner structure and laughable protection, i cant make an assertion that no one really cares about chinese viechles and no one treat chinese viechles seriously.
2 Likes
Yes，Chinese need it，I hope the developers will implement it soon, thank you for your work。
3 Likes
Players of the Chinese faction are being intentionally neglected
3 Likes
Players’ patience and passion just get worn down like that.
4 Likes
We hope that the relevant authorities take this issue seriously and implement measures as soon as possible.
3 Likes
天燕90的头瞄
2 Likes
We need spall liners
3 Likes
Please use English, otherwise please post in national communities subsection:
thank you
1 Like
is it so hard adding spall liners??
2 Likes
if developer don’t want to put correct armor on the Chinese MBT, at least put the spall liners on it
1 Like
In fact, Gaijin has already added spall liners to Leopard 2A7, Strv 122, Challenger, T-90M, and other top vehicles 2 years ago at this point. Accordingly, most spall liner bug report issues were posted in the same time, two years ago… The ones that haven’t been marked “not a bug” are then “submitted as suggestion” and then forgotten about. This long wait significantly shows Gaijin’s negligence.
1 Like
It is not getting any better for gaijin huh. The Chinese have sharpened their pitchforks and have good reason
So do many Chinese vehicles. Although Gaijin have “accepted” lots of issues, they don’t fix it after a very long time ranging from 3 months to several years, not only including the MBTs, but also the ZSL92 and HQ-17. Those needed to be fixed including armours, camouflage and shells, so we have the right to argue whether Gaijin really want to fix problems of Chinese vehicles as they say they have Insufficient production capacity but can wrongly “create” a basket to VT-5 in just one day.
1 Like
yes，i agree you！