Chinese Extended Ground Tree Discussion

The developers said that wt support only 5 branches now.

1 Like

为何不向开发人员提出建议更改科技树布局?

Useless lol.

This is what I’m hoping for

China

Type 59 - 7.7 (APCBC)
Type 59-I - 8.0 (Type 59 APFSDS)
Type 59-II - 8.7 (Type 83 APFSDS)
Type 88A - 9.3 (Type 83 APFSDS)

Type 69 - 8.0 (PT71-100 APFSDS)
Type 69-I - 8.3 (Type 59 APFSDS)
Type 69-II - 9.0 (DTW2-100 APFSDS)
Type 85-II - 9.7 (DTW2-105 APFSDS)

ZTZ96 - 10.0 (125-I)
ZTZ96A (P) - 10.7 (125-I)
ZTZ96A - 11.0 (DTW-125)
VT-4 - 11.3 (DTW-125)
ZTZ96B - 11.7 (DTC10-125)
VT-4A1 - 12.0 (DTC10-125)

ZTZ99 - 10.3 (125-I)
ZTZ99-I - 11.0 (DTW-125)
ZTZ99-II - 11.3 (DTW-125)
ZTZ99A - 12.0 (DTC10-125)
WZ1001 - 12.3 (DTC10-125)
ZTZ99-140 - 13.0 (DTW-140)

Russia
T-54 - 7.7 (APCBC)
T-54A - 8.0 (3BM-20)
T-55A - 8.3 (3BM-25)
T-55AM - 8.7 (3BM-25)
T-72 Ural-1 - 9.0 (3BM15)
T-72A - 9.3 (3BM-22)
T-72B “84” - 9.7 (3BM-26 / 3BM-29)
T-72B “85” - 10.0 (3BM-32)
T-72B “89” - 10.7 (3BM-42)
T-90A - 11.3 (3BM-42-2)
T-72B3M - 11.7 (3BM-60)
T-90M - 12.3 (3BM-60)
Object 195 - 13.0 (experimental apfsds)

T-62 - 8.3 (3BM-6)
T-62M-1 - 8.7 (3BM-21)
T-64A - 9.0 (3BM-15)
T-64B - 9.3 (3BM-22)
T-64BV - 9.7 (3BM-26 / 3BM-29)
T-80BV - 10.0 (3BM-32)
T-80U - 10.7 (3BM-42)
T-80UM - 11.3 (3BM-42-2)
T-80BVM - 12.0 (3BM-60)
T-14 Prototype - 12.3 (3BM-60)
T-14 Production - 13.0 (3BM-69)

Germany
Leopard 1 - 8.0 (L28A1)
Leopard A1A1 - 8.3 (L28A1)
M48A2 G A2 - 8.7 (M111)
Leopard 1A3 - 9.0 (M111)
Leopard 1A5 - 9.7 (M413)
Leopard 2A0 - 10.0 (DM13)
Leopard 2A4 - 10.3 (DM23)
Leopard 2A5 - 11.0 (DM33)
Leopard 2PL - 11.3 (Pz.531)
Leopard 2A6 - 12.0 (DM53)
Leopard 2A7 - 12.3 (DM63A1)
Leopard 2A7V - 12.7 (DM73)
Leopard 2A8 - 13.0 (LKE Neo)

2 Likes

I really hope gajjin keeps all options open for Chinese ground forces, as there starting too run out of top tier worthy MBT’s and we will essentially need vehicles like the M1A2T and The best possible version of the VT-4 too help china have a top tier worthy lineup. Also adding more high BR light tanks and IFV’s along with better SPAA would greatly increase Chinas capabilities and options on the ground

It’s missing a north Korean subtree. Looks good otherwise

1 Like

NK can provide some event or premium vehcile :)

We need more SPAA for China, not only toptier spaa, but also like PGZ88 or ty90 launcher on the ground.

2 Likes

I have created a tech tree for the Chinese Air Force myself (with rank based on the US technology tree created by others). There may be a large number of errors among them.
Would you like to take a look :)

IMG_7882

Yitian SPAA when?
8X TY-90s on a WZ-551 hull.

6 Likes

How do we feel about a Pakistani Sub tree for China? It would open the door for some cool vehicles and could really boost china at top tier especially. Something I’m interested in would be the Pakistani version of the T-80UD which I remember correctly used an improved transmission form the Ukrainian T-84’s. While it’s engine would be less powerful, it’s mobility would in some ways be better thanks too a better transmission.

3 Likes

Pakistan would be neat. North korean event/premiums would also be neat

1 Like

I’d like to see either an “export” line or a Pakistan line personally. God I just want the mighty Jeff 🤣.

2 Likes

What’s the mighty Jeff?

Also while I’m at it, does anyone have any good info on the transmission of the Pakistani T-80UD?

1 Like

JF-17 thunder

3 Likes

Thank you, however this is about the Soviet version of the T-80UD, and while it is cool and I hope it comes too the USSR tech tree, I’m specifically speaking about the late batch of T-80UD’s that Pakistan received from Ukraine that were modified with the T-84 transmission I believe. I hope that version comes too China

Very nice tree. I especially hope to see the Project 704 tank ingame someday.

Right now I think the most important vehicles China could use are better SPAA in the 10.0-11.7 range, and more high end light tanks so we don’t have too keep using the Boat car! It seems that the VT-4 is in the way as it’s been found in the files for a while, and we may even get the Taiwanese M1A2T as it was passed too developers not too long ago