Some missiles such as Meteor has ram jet engine but PL-12 doesn’t have it. Unlike Ram jet engine solid rocket motor doesn’t require external oxidizer, the fuel contains both oxidizer and fuel(which can save space). Solid rocket motors use a thick paste like fuel which once ignited can’t be put out but Ram jets can cut off ignition I think.
The comment you’re replying to is pure sarcasm in the first sentence, pointing it out just in case.
lmao I didn’t notice that
Looks like there is some new hope
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yEqs8mC6DsdH
Now the question is do we have good sources for the motor because all I saw were meaningless range numbe. There was one with head on scenario specified but tertiary at best
Hopefully, that report combined with this report that says the missile is meant to be 214 kg should be more than enough for them to realise the missile needs a revision
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KZTWs9hPH3hr
Some PL-5EII placards including an official cross-section.
And some for the SD-10A, including a proposed SAM variant and a cross-section.
btw that bug report is very likely AI generated (including most of the attached pictures)
ye
Nope, given the fact that it is still 3rd gen and seekers are heavily nerfed I think it won’t make much of a difference. Not worth it.
anyone know what seeker head base pl-12 uses? I want to say it uses base r-77 seekerhead but not actually sure on that

I dont think its known tbh, the SD-10 (predessecor of the PL-12/SD-10A) used alot of RU component, afaik it should be a 9B1103M analogue for it. Idk what the SD-10A/PL-12 use
FFS

gotta love that one guy ruining bug reporting for everyone
So unfortunate man. I hope photos like these aren’t banned now:
time to start copemaxxing
did say that earlier in the thread
Now they have another excuse to deny bug reports
For all those hoping/ coping for a better motor for the PL-12A in particular

its not getting it, the only hope is the mach 5 buff for the entire familiy
















