PL9CIt is one of the best missiles with multiple anti-jamming capability before infrared image anti-jamming measures
dude why?
Because currently AAM-3 better PL-8, at least PL-8B equal or closed to AAM-3
Actually AAM-3 is more simmilar to Aim-9M
AAM-3 flare resistance same AIM-9M but more maneuverability ?
I mean yeah technically but it doesnt matter because its Not thrust vectoring like R-73.
Pl-8B has better IRCCM. It uses image processing to compare between what the different elements of the seeker sees. So like one part of the seeker would see the IR of the fuselage, another the IR of the engine exhaust, but both will see the flare IR and thus the missile will determine it is a flare and filter it. The Pl-8B I think has 4 elements that it checks in, so it does this comparison against 4 images. The AAM-3 is the closest to this since it uses an additional seeker element but I don’t think it is actually modeled in game since it behaves just like a 9M. At least, that’s my understanding of the missile seekers.
3 Likes
J-8 with PL-12.
7 Likes
There is an improved ty90 with double delta canards, imagine those with 30g pull
Someone wrote warthunder on that plate. He must be an warthunder player.
3 Likes
did you write this?
how many pl12 are we talking on j8f?
2x
1 Like
SD-10/PL-12 public info collected by the Chinese communities:
3 Likes
Cool to see such work done by the community!
1 Like
I expect gajin consider add another domestic chinese & taiwan infrared Air-to-Air Missile in first major update & second major update
- PL-2B
- PL-5E
- PL-5E II
- PL-8B
- PL-9C
- TC-1
3 Likes
Can you post a translated version of it on the forum?
Author said repost is forbidden. That post is mostly an analysis based on crowd source, with some primary source from designer saying that the dV of SD-10 is greater than Mach 3 (since designers in China compares delta V of missiles instead of maximum speed or other metrics).
That only makes sense, the R-77 and AMRAAM are higher than mach 3… Even the AIM-7F is higher if I recall correctly.