From their community, it sounds like their existing tanks need fixing. And I support that. They absolutely do not need a US MBT.
1000% agree. Since Chinese playerbase logic was that VT-4 shouldn’t be in the Japanese tt because they were an adversary irl, neither should a US made tank in Taiwanese service be placed in Chinese tt.
If an M1A2T gets ever suggested as a potential vehicle to the Chinese tt, the American playerbase have every right to boycott that decision and I fully support them in that. Period.
7 Likes
You’re taking it way too seriously like it’s going to effect the game, it’s not, it’s clearly a personal preference.
Its not going to affect the game if they don’t get it. Your argument goes both ways. Players can and will push back on this, as they should.
1 Like
Well they are so I don’t understand your argument
they will get entire barely playable MBT, you know… that is huge difference(it’s not)
They have plenty of domestic vehicles that, by their own community, only need to be fixed. Giving them an Abrams is not the fix.
1 Like
They haven’t. There are plans to give them one amd players are pushing back. What is so confusing on that? I mean, Singapore was suppose to go to China. Look at that, its not happening now.
I’ve seen a few cope threads that have gotten closed because that’s exactly what they are, it’s not going to change the trajectory XD.
1 Like
They do need US, russian and japanese vehicles because else chinese tt would be non-existent till rank V or VI. Just not a modern mbt since there finally is domestic options at top tier else it would be hilarious.
1 Like
let him cope on redfor.
They’ve done so recently btw. Like in the exact post announcing an Abrams for China.
I think the point is fair, but the argument is lackluster.
Specifically, China should not receive an Abrams. Why? The Thai VT-4. Simple as. You don’t like other nations having your vehicles, then you shouldn’t get export ones period. They are lucky Taiwan/imported vehicles is more than half their dang tech tree or else I’d have said strip them if Taiwan and readjust, too.
1 Like
@MokaMoki
“RO China is not China.” is such a wild and inaccurate statement.
Imagine claiming that the people of RO China aren’t legitimate people; that statement is so easily interpreted as xenophobic.
And no, China cannot be moved to the US tech tree. That’s like moving Germany to the US tech tree.
So you oppose USA getting SEP3 as well? Or do you have double standards?
5 Likes
china should gets the taiwanese abrams, but thailand should get the thai vt4. and most importantly china should not get the m1a2T until america has the m1a2sepv3, m1a2t would be better than the american sepv2 by virtue of not having forced TUSK 2
Israel launched with a much smaller tech tree than everyone else so I don’t see how that is an argument here. Gaijin has also said not every nation has enough to make a dedicated tree so maybe China is just a small modern tree. That would be its appeal to grind then.
100% either everyone gets what they want and the whole point of tech tree to get unique vehicles of that particular nation gets shafted or nobody gets it. No double standard, unfortunately gaijin is not headed towards the right direction in that aspect.
2 Likes
Israel starts from rank IV at least, definitely a tech tree does not need to start all the way from rank I if they have enough unique vehicles later on to form a tech tree.
Why does gaijin not remove rank I to IV of chinese tt like israel? Because it brings sales, chinese players buy premiums to skip to toptier vehicles. More profit.
Just doesn’t need a US Abrams. Let’s respect their wishes and answer kindly with no more modern US vehicles in the Chinese tech tree.
i think that they delayed the vt4 to work an m1a2t, as a “shut up you got something too” vehicle, shouldnt be a thing as they already have plenty of western vehicles but eh.
edit: i dont mean the m1a2t shouldnt be a thing, i just think vt4 shouldve been in tt day one