oh yeah, there are a few in the sweedish tech tree, because it needed a finnish sub tree to fill massive gaps in its air tree
Evidence of Chinese love Western tanks more then there own Tank.
1 Like
they really dont, because all of them were from the short time frame when gaijin was copying as many planes as they possibly could so they could say there were more planes in the game than a competitor, they are also all premium not in the tech tree and relatively rare to see in a match
Oh wow, You named a tank, That totally means its entirely yours then! /s.
Im going to call the Concept 3 “Steve”, US tree when?
The US used Fireflies but i see no Fireflies in their tree either.
the US has its own unique T80 variant but for some reason its not in the tech tree
Did you guys operate Concept 3, officially?
We did. (I meant M24)
I am fine that you guys have Fireflies.
I’m having Doritos. Both are good options.
1 Like
Alright it’s made continue guys
Im just calling out the “We named it” part.
Either way, The British tree is currently among the most unique in the game (And they have more research tree vehicles than the US), Adding more copy-paste garbage will only make it less interesting especially when the British have their own light tanks in the M24’s BR range.
If they had some hybrid that used a part of it like the French abomination (AMX-13 M24) Then id support it.
What do you think RoC stands for?
2 Likes
I know what it stands for. Doesn’t matter or change the situation. RoC could actually be moved to the US tree since so many of their vehicles are US-made. China does not need an American Abrams.
1 Like
Taiwan is fine where it is, getting a Abrams isn’t going to hurt the U.S. tree.
1 Like
And not getting an Abrams isn’t going to hurt China.
2 Likes
China does need a competitive MBT.
2 Likes
This mentality is going to be the reason why excitement is killed off for Sub trees or any new nations, individual complain and whine that X nations tank is going into a X nations tree, just get over it, it’s going to happen.
2 Likes
I don’t blame them, type 99 uses bathroom tiles as ERA.
I find it hilarious that most chinese players i encounter are US mains.
1 Like
It’s already ruined with all those copy pastes and US has copies across multiple nations already.
Sim is dead and is already ruined by these copies so nothing would change.
For me, I want British M24 badly because Crommy is a good makeshift light tank, but it doesn’t have APHE and fancy 50cal.
But yeah, about this part, I also partially agree with you.
We can have British M24 in our tree, maybe it should’ve been sooner than M44, but also not in the near future.
(Sad part is we already have M44.)
I want M24 of ours, but it isn’t urgent.
AFAIK, we didn’t build Chimaera M24 of our own.
For the French part, AFAIK, French were the biggest consumers of M24 after WW2
So I think they have the right to have their normal M24.
Maybe They are bit more urgent than us(Brits)
Back to the original topic,
I am well aware of what you guys are worrying about
But I think neglecting M1A2T is not right.
Because
-They bought it
-You sold it
-They used it.
Better than their [ROK F-35 to China!] claim before.
So, I am supporting by adding a distinct additional line.
-Only when Chinese let the Thai have their VT4.
If they really want to gatekeep VT4 forevermore, then you guys have the right to gatekeep M1A2T forevermore.
I think this doesn’t contradict.
Or perhaps it needs good players…
2 Likes
Dont want people to be upset, dont do controversial things; like giving a rivial vehicle to a nation’s biggest adversary. You are aware relations between the US and China are not good right? You have access to the internet so I assume so. “Lets give the US tank to US’s biggest rival. Surely such a decision will not upset anyone at all”. Just don’t give it to them and problem solved. Add it to the US like the Australian Abrams if it needs to come to the game. Take you own advice and understand people against such will push back on it. Like they are.
1 Like