Thx man!
Also clicked for you, let’s make the game better little by little. <3
2 Likes
Yeah Protection analysis and armor in a actual match is often quite different for most vehicles.
1 Like
Honestly, raising the BR to 10.3 would be pointless. From my experience 10.0 basically doesn’t exist anymore, unless you get a full downtier, you are almost always in a 10.3 match anyways. Couple that with the fact that China has literally no 10.3 vehicle, means it would be a pointless nerf and a nerf to 10.7 would be too much.
1 Like
Id generally agree, but if you look at it just prefromance wise, I feel it’s easy too argue that the MBT-2000/VT-1 is definitely a better tank overall than the ZTZ-96A. But at the same time I would agree that it doesn’t really deserve a BR I crease as it would be by itself as. 10.3 vehicle. Personally I’m hoping that china quickly gets more vehicles such as the VT-5/Type 15 light tank around 10.3 and a new SPAA that can help fill the ranks between the PGZ-04 and the Tor. I’m also praying that China gets some better CAS options beyond the Q-5L and current F-16, as all these additions would help china have a fully flushed lineup, and give more players an incentive to play the nation
3 Likes
JH-7 should do the job
1 Like
For sure, I hope we get it or another CAS platform for China before the year ends. Also I hope we see the VT-4 sooner than later, and same with a new SPAA. The VT-4 has the potential too be a very competitive tank even at 11.7 given it’s stats, and would be a very nice backup too the ZTZ-99A
2 Likes
What’s the best Ammo the VT-4 can fire?
idk but it should be same as the latest chinese mbts
I wouldn’t be surprised if Gajjin simply gives it chinas best round simply too allow it too stay around 11.7 without any problems
yeah that could happen
DTC-10 same to 99A.
3 Likes
Why DTC-10 was removed from MBT-2000?For balancing?
In order to stay in 10.0, I guess in the future, Al-Khalid produced in Pakistan will be allowed to carry better shells such as BTA4 as a new MBT with higher BR.
3 Likes
Because it is 10.0 now, if gaijin move it to 10.0 it may get 500KE+ shell.
1 Like
I hope a Pakistani Sub tree gets added too china someday, would open the door for some cool vehicles like the JF-17 and Pakistani T-80UD with better reverse gear I think.
3 Likes
Does anyone know what the armor protection of the VT-5 is with its composite? It seems to actually have more armor than than base Type 15 light tank
It varies depending on the armor package. Most VT-5s dont have ERA,so we can expect it to have slightly less armor compared to ZTQ-15.Or maybe it has better composite armor that’s why ERA blocks arent used.
Here are some pictures of our VT-5s.You can see it lacks ERA blocks.
Spoiler
1 Like
Its interesting because it seems that a similar type of armor is used with the MBT-3000, where instead of using the topical Chinese armour style of a thick base composite block with ERA then stacked on top, they opted too give the VT-4/MBT-3000 extra composite armor on the front of the turret, even tho almost all tanks in service with china use both composite and ERA.
Speaking of the VT-4/MBT-3000 I can’t find any source that gives an accurate or reliable estimate for the composite armor values. We have good sources for the protection offered by the MBT-2000, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Norinco upgraded the composite material of the tank when they made the VT-4, but I just can’t find a source that confirms this, atleast not in the English side of the Internet
1 Like
Is this the VT5 purchased in Bangladesh? The VT and VN series in China can be optionally installed according to customer needs. If you are willing to pay, you can even purchase vehicles with VT chassis VN turrets, including side and front ERAs, composite armor, weapon stations, engine packs, ammunition, and fire control systems！
4 Likes