They have the link of being Finnish service vehicles and Finland and Sweden being mutual defense partners. No such link exists between Israel and Chile. I understand you want to have your countries vehicles represented in game, but shoehorning them into a minor tree is rather pathetic way to get more support. I fully support a combined SA tree or an Israeli style implementation where you must reach X rank in others to access it.
With the answer you give me now you automatically invalidate your supposed previous argument, and in fact you support what I say since historically Israel has been a partner of Chile selling weapons when no other country was willing, and by saying pathetic you denote your frustration with a desire to insult me.
4 Likes
Selling equipment =/= mutual defense
No. It’s a pathetic move to only have Israel as a voting option for a Sub-tree. Its the most minor of nations so people will vote for it just to have more vehicles in its tree. It’s pandering for the sympathy vote. I see almost entirely French, British and US vehicles yet no suggestion for any of those trees.
1 Like
First you complained about including vehicles that have nothing to do with the main tree, then you left that aside saying that it is supposed to be justified in the case of Sweden and Finland because they sell weapons to each other (?) (it seems that you just look for excuses to complain or to invalidate the tree).
I see very clearly that in the survey I posted there are more options besides Israel, there is also the option of “others” in case someone is not comfortable with any of the other options, I repeat, it seems that you are only looking for excuses.
The only daft thing here is your reading comprehension. Mutual defense partners are not selling weapons to each other, they are saying hey we got your back if things go south, without a specific signed treaty. The Chilean subtree would be fine as a component of a combined SA tree, there is certainly more in common there than with Israel.
Excuse me, or you hope columbian could be sub-tree for Israel tree instead chilean ?
And chilean might be part of Rio de la Plata tech tree ?
I’m of the opinion Israel doesn’t need a subtree. I feel the South American nations should go into a combined South American tree
Mean all countries from south american (columbian, venezuelan, Peruvian & chilean) might be part of Rio de la Plata tech tree ?
If you think that then why didn’t you vote for that in my poll? literally in the description of my post I mentioned it and it is also clarified that the sub tree was an example in Israel because they currently have more in common with Chile than any other nation in the game
It comes across as a odd choice of nations for an Israel sub-tree IMO, and might be better in the SA tree. But I love the idea of a sub-tree filling up tiers 1-3, paired with Israel tiers 1-3 as previously suggested. It’d make more people play Israel by making it the same as other nations. I just dont know if Chile is justifiable enough. I love the effort though! Well done.
1 Like
Thank you very much for your good vibes, I would also like Israel to get the lower ranks, before making my sub trees I met quite a few people from Israel with whom I have spoken for several months and who helped me with some technical information or with their opinions about the BR of things from Chile, I asked them what would be a nation that would serve as a sub tree for them, most of them said Chile or Turkey, my intention was always to help Israel get its low ranks and get vehicles of quality with my trees, that’s why I would like more people from Israel to comment here to know what they think, I would also agree with a future latam tree, that would be a dream, let’s hope it happens one day. Of course, I already saw that yoyo post and I commented on it and voted in favor :)
4 Likes
I added the descriptions of each aircraft so that people reading this suggestion have more information about these aircraft such as history, features, modifications, etc.
3 Likes
The Chilean Air Sub-Tree should be under the German tech-tree (I just want a Chilean F-16 as a squadron vehicle in my German lineup)
2 Likes
No
Germany does not need another subtree let alone the Chilean subtree
4 Likes
Yes, I agree, that is why I focused my sub tree on Israel as an example and not on another nation.
A whole tree makes little sense.
I didn’t understand what you meant
Regarding the addition of Chilean vehicles in one tree be it a standalone or a sub tree.
+1, It would be an interesting addition to Israel, such a proposition is quite interesting and one which I wouldn’t have considered prior to reading about the close defence ties.
5 Likes
Sorry, but the last thing Germany needs is more vehicles, they already have a very good lineup as it is, and Gaijin has already shown preferential treatment with things like the Hunter Mk.58.
2 Likes