I do forget about the ztz96, thing looks like a deamon but i hardly see them in game tbh
Just don’t put on the ERA…
1 Like
I enjoy it. Not saying it’s OP or anything, but it’s a fun vehicle to play. It’s just a vehicle that is all in for the gun. Basically, don’t play it like an MBT.
This thing is no joke lol you can literally camp a corner because it has a 5 second reload timer and shoot 3bm42 equivalent ap round at 9.0. Still remember one time I’ve got a triple kill in a 1vs3 losing match waiting at a corner in Breslau, two trying to push me after I’ve killed the first one, only one of them managed to fire a round but the engine of ptz absorb it and at the same time sent that dude back to the hangar
1 Like
1.- British Vehicles Struggle.
2.- British Vehicle Players get better at dealing with US/GER/USSR-RU vehicles after a period of adjustment.
3.- US/GER/USSR-RU keep doing as they do.
4.- British stats go up.
5.- Can’t have the main demographic have a bad time.
6.- Nerf/Up-BR British Vehicles. [YOU ARE HERE]
7.- Repeat
2 Likes
Even if we look at other minor nations, those two are still the best performing vehicles at their BR.
What gives ? Don’t tell me Chinese, Japanese, Israeli, Italian players are also bad at the game and only British ones don’t.
Italian tanks are just so bad it requires a monumental effort to win (unless its my beloved OF-40 mtca). Japan does just fine and i dont know about the others but from the sounds of it china has an even better 9.0 tank than us so whats all the huff about? Most russian tanks still get aphe at this br and can just shoot the cupola? and in urban combat if your shooting the turret that is entirely on you lol.
I wouldn’t say they’re bad players, China gets pretty preferential treatment in a lot of departments.
Japan’s early grind does teach Japan mains how to play better and Italy is just playing on hard mode.
I don’t know about Israel since it’s just USA Jr with some French and British stuff.
However for the purposes of this conversation, it is more about Gaijin kicking Britain down periodically every time the main demographic’s average starts looking bad.
Italy doesn’t need kicking down because it’s already hell, Japan somehow flies under the radar. China not being as coddled as the USSR doesn’t mean they’re being mistreated and Israel is just an odd tree.
It’s about the usual complaint that British tanks sucks and that their BR increase is unjustified, when in reality they have excellent performance.
Lets be honest here, those two club on every 9.0 T-55 there is.
1 Like
To be honest, Britain gets kicked down when it deserves, at least from what I’ve seen in Ground.
So the challenger TES being at 11.7 while were having a t72b3 get moved down to 11.3 is fair? Having the armour on all challengers be worse than irl because “we dont believe”? Most of our tanks are specialised in one area you dont see often and when you do you’ll have people complaining about “camping” when we do.
1 Like
That’s not really exclusive to Britain and is shared by many minor nations.
Simply can’t want to face the goddam t-80ud in a chieftain 900.
If gaijin are dead set on moving it up- then it only seems fair to give it the composite it should have.
Just like T-54 (and most other 8.0 tanks) users couldn’t wait to face a Chieftain Mk10.
I think we met in a match today and you shot the nuke down and saved the match. Good job son
Heh - it was awesome.
Reading comprehension issues again I see.
I said chieftain 900 - not mk 10
Doesn’t seem to be any less obnoxious to 8.0s though.
A little matter of the composite turret armour on the mk10 whereas the 900 is RHA. There’s a huge difference.
the whataboutism doesn’t really mean much, as if an M60 has a fun time facing the T-55AM, T-55AM to 9.3? (no)
Mk 10 was arguably among the best 9.0s, the 900 going up just seems more and more wrong the more I think about it, the thing has the same Hp/t ratio as the Object 435 and armour that is basically a Mk.5 with structural steel, it is not 9.3 material.